

Good politician is generally taken to mean good at corralling the other politicians into passing your agendas, at least how I usually see it use. Like how people call McConnell a “good” politician . Idk tho


Good politician is generally taken to mean good at corralling the other politicians into passing your agendas, at least how I usually see it use. Like how people call McConnell a “good” politician . Idk tho
Ignore the genocide that y’all love to lie about. Ignore the oppression of their own citizens. Ignore the fascist take over of hong kong. Ignore that only their approved candidates can hold office. Ignore the disappearing of citizens. Both are godawful Nations.
Being able to fight for rights without spilling blood was a hard fought privilege. Blood spilling is not the only way to succeed. Though I will not deny it works, safer options should not be fully scorned.


Tbh I wouldn’t be surprised. The bigger question is, does it cause more cancer than it prevents


As a bicyclist and pedestrian, many roads are above safe levels. Others it’s well below. Tbh it’s all arbitrary


That’s saving, not spending… Those things don’t hit the accounts for something like 48 hours.


I understood. I’m saying there’s a whole lot less reason to boycott if they become union


Unions can make even horrible companies treat their workers with decency… Or at least pay them for the bad treatment. Shop union.


instead we should discourage people from filing civil suits entirely by making sure only people who can afford to pay the defendants’ lawyers fees will file them
That’s not how it plays out in reality.


Why? That accomplishes only increased government costs when the same accessibility could be brought about by allowing the loser of the case to take on reasonable lawyer fees of both people.


I mean you stayed.
If the public defenders are good enough for everyone else
as a present which is not the case, since they’re not in civil lawsuits


Yeah. That’s the proper response to your statement being wrong. Lol. . .
Yes, the system has issues–the issue being that the loser in the suit doesn’t take the burden of reasonable attorney costs for both parties. That alone would fix most of it. Government doesn’t need to give anyone a right to a civil lawyer.


You don’t get a public defender for civil lawsuits, which are the majority of those kinds of lawsuits. So no, public defenders aren’t good enough for everyone, because they don’t exist for civil lawsuits.
Honestly I’ve had a different experience. I’ve been wrong, as anyone ever has, on the Internet. And usually the person I’m arguing will accept an apology with grace, and will even get upvotes for doing so. But the apology doesn’t need to be accepted, to still be good to do.
Conviction of attempted election interference should be an automatic life sentence imo…


It is left vs right. To left is to be anti rich. To be right is to be pro rich.


I don’t think it’s the best option. But I think it’s realistic. And hey, nothing is stopping us from trying both takeover and making our own party, right?


This is the result of capitalism, caused by it. Capitalism inevitably brings about a failed system.
But, unions are also a part of capitalism . They allow every to bargain. Otherwise, everything is captive to the rich
To be extremely clear. THAT WAS ONE OF HER POLICIES