Pretty sure Chuck would let them through. So long as they were sufficiently zionist.

They could set up a green room mimicking the 4th celebration as a background. It’s not like anyone is there to dispute it.

It’s a shame how obvious the crisis is while capitalism insists on us all fucking around. Maybe we don’t all want to find out together. Too bad, we don’t matter.

They handwave at Pelosi and vaguely at congressional inside trading. Obviously the scale is beyond their feeble brains’ ability to comprehend earning 6m+ per day for his family of ghouls. That being said, insider trading has definitely applied a wet towel to Democrats’ ability to rally against blatant out and about corruption. This is another great example of why a particular type of Democrat needs to go away asap. But also an example of why we need to nationalize his properties to get our money back.

I hope Mitch and all the geriatric octogenarian dinos and conservatives will be there to show their support. It’d also make the place feel less empty.

Maybe Mitch and Trump will have one of those dual deaths where they’re only holding out for each other.

Buh-bye zionist bitch

Didn’t really address the argument. It’s not out of context and Google is free.

Your other argument is that it’s a slippery slope between not supporting a genociding ethnostate and not liking minorities in your own nation? Maybe when you’re an ethnonationalist. Do you think Lemmy is majority ethnonationalist? Are you one? Ironically it’s almost explicitly ethnonationalists that do support Israel because they can see the narrative of a, “successful ethnostate” as a justification for having their own, usually white Christian, version.

I have no idea where you’re seeing rampant antisemitism from the left, I highly highly suspect it’s actually from the right and you’re being bamboozled. If anything we often ignore the fact that there’s majority support for Israel amongst Jews because we understand there’s also a lot of jews standing strong against the genocide and we don’t want to antisemetically lump them all in the way people who talk like you often do, where you’re cagey about insulting a nation state to spare the feelings of Jewish supremacists or god forbid Jews who just like the place (I wonder why). I can freely say “fuck jewish supremacists” knowing anyone who would read between the lines to more than supremacists is not arguing in good faith anyways. Being a liberal identity politics obsessive person sounds EXHAUSTING dude.

Qatar? The same country we abandoned to protect Israel? Hope they enjoy the symbol of that betrayal.

I don’t believe that it actually entails any hierarchy beyond some new positions which amount to coordinators. It’s basically a free pass to allow millitary dollars to be spent through Israel though, except without contracts like someone like Blackwater would need and allows collaboration on all levels at the discretion of military leaders, which would naturally just be a compromised pedophile Trump, who acts as a unitary executive.

https://armedservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/fy27_ndaa_chairmans_mark_-_final.pdf This is the context for it if you like reading government (lobbyist) legalise.

It’s literally part of the House’s NDAA proposal. It allows millitary personnel and leadership to direct millitary funds directly to collaboration on all levels of millitary and intelligence with Israel, effectively bypassing the defense spending reserved by congress for them and leaving it in the hands of a compromised cabinet. Not conspiracy at all, and in fact draws up a better question. When are you going to give up on the “anti-israel is anti-jew” bullshit?

No, but Gaza and the West Bank sure do. We should switch the entire fund to rebuilding them and taking back their borders. They can choose whether to keep the trashy bullshit built on their land.

Sure wish I could act like Cartman and still get 200k salary with benefits and no ethics laws that matter… jk I have some dignity

They were probably too spicy for all 20 people in attendance anyways.

The point is pretty clearly, “If your proposed rule had applied to you.” Dunno what’s confusing about it.

Who would rush in such a situation?

Domestic terrorist doesn’t like a court ruling, why did someone even ask this worm?

Think you’re just experiencing strawberries being a cheaper fruit by weight than raspberries, but I appreciate the diligence.