I don’t know what that means but they sound confident. Let’s do it!
I was here.
I don’t know what that means but they sound confident. Let’s do it!
Hire for what, a janitor? Sounds legit.
My guess is It’s probably cheaper and has much greater variety. You can watch anything from any streaming service through one single interface at the price of one service.
And ChatGPT, of course.
The biggest tragedy is when these projects aren’t opened up for the community. OSS would welcome this immensely.
I still don’t understand why they didn’t go for a sequel. It would’ve been much better with better controls and new content, IMO.
Oh, for sure, or maybe some statistical method that doesn’t require that much processing. I don’t doubt it’ll work, though. Google is wasting their time and energy with this.
I’ve heard that, and they look nice on women, but I honestly don’t.
My gay ass still looked at the bobs for longer than I felt comfortable with. *shrug*
I also love the “Will you please let our dedicated team and our 658 partners use cookies and your private data? Pewtie pwease?? UwU”
I have a feeling you didn’t play regularly. I understand your frustration, but if you do play regularly, all these changes are welcome because they keep the game fresh.
Oh, you beetlejuicer you!
But you are correct
That’s what the article says, not me! lol
Feedback across the Firefox and YouTube subreddits highlighted that it could break timestamped video links and chapter markers. However, YouTube knows the length of the ads it would inject, and can offset subsequent timestamps suitably.
The move also adds a layer of unnecessary complexity in saving Premium viewers from these ads. If they are added server-side, the YouTube client would have to auto-skip them for Premium members, but that also means ad segment info will be relayed to the client, opening up a window of opportunity for ad blockers to use the same information meant for Premium subscribers and skip injected ads automatically.
It sounds like there’s a silver lining after all.
Can we not be offended on behalf of other people? It’s so obnoxious.
Yep.
No, it’s a PR move. Why would anyone use Firefox 12.0 when Chrome is so obviously more advanced with a fast release cycle sitting at version 120+?
A big black chicken, yes.
You can use ChatGPT for that! Here’s what it spit out when I asked it to romanize the names and write them inline.
Пятницкiй (Pyatnitsky), Скиталецъ (Skitalets), М. Горький (M. Gorky), Найденовъ (Naydenov), Л. Андреев (L. Andreev), Шаляпинъ (Shalyapin), Бунинъ (Bunin), Телешевъ (Teleshev), Чирико (Chiriko)
E: Apparently, it can also read the names on the picture! Just copy and paste it into the chat.
Works for what? Making them fall for you or making them fall unconscious?