• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 4 maanden geleden
cake
Cake day: 22 oktober 2024

help-circle
  • I also feel like a lot of people have a lot of barriers to plotting an assassination, besides the obvious “it’s illegal” and “they’ll kill you for trying” and “who has the time and money to plan an assassination.” To give people some ideas of these barriers, I personally:

    • Am trans, so if I tried anything it would immediately be used as a Reichstag fire moment to start rounding up and killing trans people (I suspect the social minorities who will be most affected by the Administration will suffer the worst consequences for even trying to resist)
    • Am too young to own a gun in my state (you need to be 21, I suspect some people have the opposite reasoning as well, ‘I’m too old to be an assassin bc I have kids to look after’ or ‘because I’m entrenched and needed at my job’)
    • Since I have PTSD I don’t trust myself to own a gun
    • I think I can contribute more to the world alive than throwing my life away to be a political assassin. Specifically, I’m very passionate about healthcare reform (obviously universal healthcare, also focusing more on preventative medicine instead of waiting for people to get so chronically sick the pharmaceutical industry can harvest money from them for the rest of their lives, also giving people diet & lifestyle recommendations to treat the underlying cause of their issues instead of just drugging them up to combat their symptoms of disease), and think I have a greater chance of making an impactful change by devoting myself to that

    In conclusion, the most convenient person to plot a political assassination is a 25-35 yo straight white man well trained in firearms with tons of money, mentally healthy enough to get a firearm yet crazy enough to throw their life away, ideally recently unemployed so they have nothing to lose.

    So… a security guard affected by the mass government downsizing?


  • OneTwoThree@mander.xyztopolitics @lemmy.worldDonald Trump's Gen Z popularity plunges
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 dagen geleden

    I genuinely think the type of social media you use in your youth has a very strong influence on the type of person you become:

    Instagram/Snapchat: Average, slightly sociable

    Reddit/Tumblr: Insightful, knowledgeable about niche topics/social issues (respectively), better at writing, worse at socializing

    Twitter: Argumentative, not really capable of cohesive long-form thought, great at one liners though

    TikTok: Mindless beasts conditioned through a variable-ratio positive reinforcement algorithm to uncritically believe whatever thoughts China wants to insert in their brains: “The US is awful!!” Heck yeah! “Because of this, we’re going to not vote/vote for Trump!” Wait, what?


  • So, back in 2023 I discovered Lemmy, made an account, but after a bit quit again because I never checked it. I recently made an account again since Reddit has started getting really bad (tons of bots, tons of conservative posts on r/popular after the election, etc) and only recently started actually using said account.

    I think using Lemmy requires a different strategy than using Reddit. On Reddit, if you wanted to subscribe to, say, a Linux discussion group, you would just go to r/linux, and there would be just 4 more even more niche subs you could join, like r/linux4noobs. On Lemmy, their are 6 main Linux groups and 14 niche Linux groups across several instances.

    The first time I joined Lemmy, I subscribed to just one of these groups like I would on Reddit, but my feed didn’t have enough content so eventually I got bored. The second time around, I created I’ve just subscribed broadly to every community related to my interests, so I if I was interested in Linux I would subscribe to all 20 Linux communities.

    I then hypothesized that if I did this for every interest (ex, say my only interests were Linux & Plants, or something), that discussion of topics that was more popular on Lemmy, like Linux, would drown out my other interests. To avoid this being an issue, I made 3 accounts for 3 feeds

    • My “general account” in which I subscribed to nearly every top sub, so if I found I didn’t care about a certain topic on All I could unsubscribe instead of outright blocking those communities (that’s this account)
    • My “interests account” in which I subscribed to my personalized interests like privacy or environment
    • My “fun account” in which I subscribed to just meme, gaming, cats, etc communities

    That’s all just me though, how do y’all use Lemmy differently from Reddit? I’m curious as to how I can git gud at Lemmy lol


  • For anyone who is undocumented (and people who are documented!), it’s important to know your rights regarding ICE:

    1. Don’t open the door for ICE. They aren’t allowed into your house or workplace without a warrant signed by a judge.
    2. Ask them to leave.
    3. Stay silent. Do not talk to them without a lawyer.
    4. If you ask you your immigration status, your citizenship status, etc, don’t tell them anything. Don’t even speak to them.
    5. Even if you’re a citizen, still don’t tell them anything. ICE destroys communities, and every second of their time you waste is one less second they will spend destroying people’s lives.
    6. If you are detained, ask to talk to your lawyer. Note that ICE doesn’t provide lawyers so make sure you get one in preparation.
    7. Do not sign anything or give them any documents whatsoever without a lawyer in that room.

  • OneTwoThree@mander.xyzto196@lemmy.worldRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 dagen geleden

    This is all such a strawman argument

    “and you have to pay for it when I’m in prison.”

    Yeah, isn’t it so terrible for checks notes incarcerated people with no income to pay for medical insurance to have access to necessary healthcare…? Seriously though, you know for a fact ‘trans people in prison getting healthcare’ is not the issue that people have with the trans community, because if it was, the legislation would tackle only this. Instead, the issue seems to be with our very existence, hence the denying trans people exist, hence the branding trans people as pedophiles, etc

    “You have to let me play sports against biological girls. You can’t make me play sports against boys - it has to be girls”.

    Again, where is the proof? Which untransitioned trans woman has ever actually said this? And, for transitioned trans women, why does the issue of childrens sports teams need to be regulated by the federal government? Consider the following study: “Limited evidence suggests that physical performance of nonathletic trans people who have undergone GAHT for at least 2 years approaches that of cisgender controls. Further controlled longitudinal research is needed in trans athletes and nonathletes.”

    In my opinion, the question of “trans people in sports” is one for science, not one for politics. For instance, perhaps for sports like running, a trans woman can compete in women’s sports after 2 years of gender-affirming hormone therapy (“After 2 years of GAHT, no advantage was observed for physical performance measured by running time or in trans women”). For sports like rowing, you could have it be 4 years (“By 4 years, there was no advantage in sit-ups”)

    Trans women that demand to use the women’s restrooms before they are effectively transitioned.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen any sort of video evidence that trans women are actually doing this. The trans community gets harrassed so much most untransitioned trans women either go to the mens bathroom or just hold it.

    The LGBT+ community has spent its entire political capital on those three issues.

    The LGBT+ community has absolutely not focused on these issues, at all. Rather, right-wing think tanks like FOX News keep pushing false narratives down the general public throat, misrepresenting what the LGBT+ community wants (to have hormone replacement therapy and gender affirming surgery on the market, to not be legislated out of existence, to not be discriminated against or hate crimed, etc) into some BS strawman seemingly only constructed to make the trans community look unreasonable, or something.