![](/static/66c60d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
AI could also research past time and temperature data to add this information to historic photographs that already have time and GPS location embedded.
Not quite sure why you would use ai for it?! When you have the coordinates and the time.
AI could also research past time and temperature data to add this information to historic photographs that already have time and GPS location embedded.
Not quite sure why you would use ai for it?! When you have the coordinates and the time.
Not what i am saying. I said that it is not a given, that translation means less performance.
In theory you can achieve similar or even higher performance, all depending on how well or how bad the original machine code is. Especially when you can optimize it for a specific architecture or even a specific CPU.
And yes ARM has shown to be more power efficient then x86 CPUs even on higher load (not just low powered embedded stuff).
and any efficiency gains these fancy new ARM chips supposedly have will be lost when translating x86 to ARM.
Not a given. Translating can still be more efficient.
Everyone knows what the blue screen is. This makes the implication when the screen does appear really obvious.
No need to reinvent the wheel.
And you need a team managing it. I doubt that they have not considered it.
No Gitlab is not AGPL, it is partly MIT and the corporate branch is under a proprietary license
No, cat is not for writing files. Cat is for reading files and directing the data to standard output.
With “>” you are directing standard output to a file, in this case a blockdevice.
Why? I am free to use whatever I want. This is not Microsoft Windows.
Or just cat file.img > /dev/…
They would not be able to really. In theory every contributor (or at least the vast majority) would have to agree to that license change.
Yes. But it allows to define a custom storage layout based on user date time filename typ and album.
Absolutely yes. Even if it is not disguised executable.
It could contain an exploit which targets the video player you are opening it with.
No they can’t, that is basically illegal in every jurisdiction. Will not even click on that click bate title.
That would depend on the context. How the logo looks like does not matter most of the time, only when the logo itself is the topic.
I self host because i do not trust companies. I will not even consider giving tailscale the keys to my kingdom.
The company Tailscale is a giant target and has a much higher risk in getting compromised than my VPN or even accessible services.
Understand the technology that you use and assess your use case and threat model.
That certificate would not proof anything. Things can be overlooked or hidden enough. More eyes = more better. OS is no guarantee either.
Also, it would be way too expensive, money and time wise. Every new Version would need to be certified.
There are even reported cases where Microsoft support used that tool to activate Windows Licenses when there are problems with the License of a customer.
You can not find that Option via the default Settings menu, you have to search for it or use the outdated control panel.
Also Windows Home edition does not have this option.
Edit: you can find it actually under Windows security.
Still, it never pops up during installation.
Yep but at this point it is obvious to the user that this is not the way it is supposed to be. When you want to shoot yourself in the foot…
I am not aware of a phone that has an outdoor temperature sensor. And weather forecasts are not exact enough for this kind of application (fast altitude change)