![](/static/66c60d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
Isn’t “it takes two” couch coop?
Isn’t “it takes two” couch coop?
Ontkennen van klimaat issues? Linkje?
They’re right though. Top of the line software for certain domains (CAD, photoshop) just doesn’t exist for Linux. As much as I would want it to be.
Reality: most tech workers view it as fairly rated or slightly overrated according to the real data: https://www.techspot.com/images2/news/bigimage/2023/11/2023-11-20-image-3.png
The paper I showed earlier disagrees
I think the use case is not people doing potato study but people that want to lose weight and need to know the amount of calories in the piece of cake that’s offered at the office cafeteria.
It needn’t be exact. A ballpark calorie/sugar that’s 90% accurate would be sufficient. There’s some research that suggests that’s possible: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01082.pdf
Ik vind het maar behoorlijk generaliserend, een hele generatie in een hokje zetten en analyseren vanuit de leunstoel.
Overigens geloof ik niet in het idee dat met eigen acties je klimaatverandering tegen kan gaan ofzo. Dat idee speelt al sinds de jaren negentig “een beter milieu begint bij jezelf”. Wij zijn niet in staat om onze eigen gewoontes structureel tegen de loep te houden, en in plaats daarvan resulteert het in zelfgenoegzaamheid.
No paywall: https://archive.ph/2023.11.12-212740/https://www.ft.com/content/8fde56b7-2515-441a-9472-30c8aedcc200
Tbh, the article doesn’t really talk about the headline. Just some history and talk about Elon musk and Twitter. Not a convincing argument about social media in general.
What are you talking about?
Dit was een interessante goed onderzochte video. Hij laat mooi de beide kanten zien. Ik wist trouwens niet dat het woord "zesjescultuur" nog steeds rond ging, dat kwam nog van Balkenende geloof ik.
Focussen op leren ipv cijfers lijkt me een goed ding. In mijn ervaring op de unief leek het dat het meestal de mensen die geïnteresseerd waren in het onderwerp die er het meeste van opstaken. Dat zorgde natuurlijk ook voor hogere cijfers. Maar mensen die enkel om de cijfers gingen waren minder mee en meer gestressed (geneeskunde studenten in dit geval).
Kleine toevoeging, als het over happiness of success gaat van het land is het altijd de vraag of het "daardoor" of "ondanks" is (because or despite).
There's still the European Parliament. But yeah I guess he gets the job…
How come that one shitty device has a range of steps rather than a single number of steps?
Tbh the other side is also anecdotal. There’s no stats here.
While cool and impressive, this was not a dense forest. Not dense nor a forest, which is way less ordered
I also agree bing is nowadays often superior to Google, they’re also better than DDG imo.
While it’s a good thing that Google gets serious competition, I don’t know if Microsoft is the best company for that role. In both cases the incentives are not necessarily aligned with the customer.
I’d say that a measurement always trumps arguments. At least you know how accurate they are, this statement cannot follow from reason:
The JAMA study found that 12.5% of ChatGPT’s responses were “hallucinated,” and that the chatbot was most likely to present incorrect information when asked about localized treatment for advanced diseases or immunotherapy.
I wear masks but I absolutely hate it. Maybe if you work from home you don’t notice, but wearing that thing for 9-10 hours can be a real pain. On top of that you miss a lot of a person’s face, I had to meet a lot of new people during that time and it was hard.
Tbh the problem is not due to chat gpt but because Google doesn’t rank search results by correctness but something that is related to popularity.
In the end it was all because of Eve and that stupid apple, or maybe the snake. Why was there a tree in the first place? Also was it really necessary to make a universe? Now that’s where the trouble really started!