I suppose the point is that you should read the article before commenting on a discussion thread about the article. Misinformation is rampant and willful ignorance in propogating it is not very ethical.

Anything can be a diplomatic pouch, if you’re brave enough

It doesn’t look AI at first glance, the dudes are too out of focus. What makes you say it’s AI?

You clearly didn’t read the article.

GOP: “Okay, let’s dismantle HIPAA next!”

In another post it was helpfully pointed out that the professor in question also believes in the illuminati and other secret cabals controlling society. Take that as you will.

I thought it was quite clear. Verifying your age with an alcohol purchase receipt is a dumb idea for a large variety of reasons, including ease of acquiring one, ease of copying images, ease of printing one yourself and the cumulative ease of doing all this without an actual adult willingly involved in your scheme. It’s is not nearly as fool proof as verifying government ID.

Of course, I’m against all invasive forms of age verification. Doesn’t mean I’m going to advocate for a rally bad alternative either.

At the very least, it reflects on his own relationships with other women.

Much more so than passports or other identity documents. Come on, man, what point are you actually arguing here?

One requires an adult participant, one doesn’t.

You could probably pick up a receipt from alcohol purchase from the ground outside any liquor store…

You are being insufferable. Cherry picking terms to support your nebulous narrative all so you can feel smug about leftist politicians and redditors. When Trump denies you your vote and ICE picks up your neighbors, who will you “No true Scotsman” then?

Now explain why you think that’s relevant to the article you commented on.

8 don’t know where you live, but over here (European country) I can easily see 5 people on TikTok when I’m on the train.

If only they told us the IOC so the title can actually be followed up on

Do you have some examples?

Just so you’re aware, it is very noticeable that you also used AI to help write this post and its use of language can throw a lot of people off.

Not to detract from your project, which looks cool!

Yes, but…

Many people on self destructive paths, especially those who are addicted, close themselves off to the perspectives that others can bring. They literally do not see any other path as worthwhile other than the one they’ve committed themselves to and the thought that another path might be even more worthwhile, or the thought of being judged for their current path, short circuits some decision making.

I believe in autonomy but I also believe many people could use help to find a path that suits them even better.

I guess the news is just madlibs now

‘Slop’ is fine, it’s short and to the point and describes something for which we don’t quite have another word yet (in the context of AI) and which definitely needs to enter the public consciousness.

Agree on ‘Slams’ though.