I think it’s a bot assisted human. The amount of spam they output is inhuman but they do interact like a human at times.
I think it’s a bot assisted human. The amount of spam they output is inhuman but they do interact like a human at times.
Liberal or not I think we can all agree more unseriousness is needed on Lemmy.
The top voted comment on a shitposting post amounts to a “WELl aCTcTUAtLY” for X’s sake.
Trust me - it’s better than some fucking herb…
Just need to swap SatansMaggotyCumFart with Jimmydoreisalefty.
@SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world is simply irreverent; not a troll.
The trial is over, and there will be no more testimony
I see - I assumed wrongly they would need to testify again in a retrial if an appeal was won.
Wasn’t there also talk of declaring a mistrial at some point? Would they testify again in that case?
There is no reason to keep the order in place for witnesses, for example.
I’d argue there is plenty of reason to keep it in place for witnesses until all appeals have played out…
Frankly, he is supremely lucky to have not had an “accident” already.
More “lucky” to be working for Russia instead of against it.
Where is the line drawn between a shitpost and a shit post?
deleted by creator
Well part of the plan is to attack public school funding sooooo…
deleted by creator
You asked for context; not evidence.
From her Wikipedia article:
According to The Wall Street Journal, Melinda Gates had been meeting with divorce lawyers since at least October 2019 after Bill’s business dealings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became public, and she had warned him about associating with Epstein as early as 2013.
Probably to bring French to the forefront after divorcing Bill.
Better question would be why she kept Gates but that’s probably for recognition purposes, I’d guess.
What if the SCOTUS has gone bananas at the same time?
So is this why I’m able to receive new emails from the Google Group I joined with my non-Gmail account, but not actually access the Google group to see past messages to the group?
It should be extended beyond sentencing until any appeals have been concluded.
Huh - I had assumed the gag order would have been lifted at the conclusion of the trial. Continuing it through sentencing seemed punitive, but extending it beyond the conclusion of any pending appeals makes sense and seems perfectly fair.
I agree in principle, but technically it’s really just very low risk.
Buying into a total market index fund at 90yo could be considered high risk since it’s not unlikely for the market to go down with no time for you to recover.
But does that make it gambling?
No but he would only agree to working one day a week as POTUS.