There are CSS, JavaScript, and HTML for babies books.
I’ve never seen/found a Linux one though.
Computer Engineering for Babies is good. Its just a couple of buttons, an LED, and logic (and, or, xor, not, etc)
There are CSS, JavaScript, and HTML for babies books.
I’ve never seen/found a Linux one though.
Computer Engineering for Babies is good. Its just a couple of buttons, an LED, and logic (and, or, xor, not, etc)
Yeah, I just glanced at the top few drives I’ve pulled from my three NAS (bigger drive in there now) - two 500gb and a 4tb.
I’ve also got a ps3 sitting around, so maybe some weekend fun since I haven’t touched it in years.
Yeah all of my servers are on usff PC’s, so I get it.
If you do a hypervisor like proxmox, then throw your NVR in a VM, you can just create a couple of virtual NICs (though you’ll be back at that FW issue I’m sure).
USB NICs are pretty well supported these days though, and cheap to boot. Just need to be certain you’ve got usb3 if you want to make use of that gig though!
I’ve got a few pi-a-likes that I’m doing similar camera fun with, though using some webcams in there and a 3d printed case. At least that way they match my diy temp sensors with esp32s!
Dual nic NVR then? You could even just throw a simple switch with no uplink (but preferably managed so you can tag the traffic) and for extra safety just allow only the LAN traffic you want on the NIC/Port connected to your regular LAN from the NVR.
Nothing wrong with a DIY can though! As long as it works of course
Reolink, amcrest. Amcrest dont get anything starting with ASH in the model name.
If you want ONVIF, be sure to check the specs, many cheaper models drop support, but not all.
Some YI cameras have easily replaced firmware and can do rtsp too, but you have to do your homework on those models to be sure you’re getting one that can be modded.
You’ll still want to (IMO) toss any of them in a vlan without internet access, and rather than provide that vlan access to an NVR on another vlan, I’d lean toward your NVR having a second connection to that vlan. I’m a huge fan of segmentation though, so YMMV.
It just implies it.
The records of what she does, and the performative activism, which takes place entirely and exclusively during presidential election years - that’s what shows she isn’t putting in the work.
After repeatedly losing in Mass, the only time she runs for anything is for presidential elections. This also demonstrates she isn’t putting in the work, or she would have more involvement in more local elections.
That is about the most generic statement possible, with nearly zero knowledge of what I’m doing on yours.
So… What problem? Feel free to enlighten me.
Eh, I’d say mostly.
I have one right now that looks at data and says “Hey, this is weird, here are related things that are different when this weird thing happened. Seems like that may be the cause.”
Which is pretty well within what they are good at, especially if you are doing the training yourself.
Yup, debian is where I was before Ubuntu, and where I went back to. Still what I run mostly, plus a few different flavors of it (proxmox for example).
Though I’m also running an arch desktop on one of my play machines, kind of reminds me of having to write my x conf out in the 90s! Not bad overall.
(Never giving up my deb stable servers though!)
Yes, and I don’t consider that an “easy to disable” option for regular users, but that’s just my opinion.
“Easy to disable” is also the wrong approach, IMO. It should have been “easy to enable” - stuff like this should always be opt-in, not opt-out. Opt-out, to me, demonstrates a company’s motivations more than anything else.
Ehh… not at first. That was a later release.
I’ve definitely trimmed some artists from my personal music library over their politics.
Does Romancing the Foam have a kidnapped lounge chair and treasure hunting?
A dumb phone and a feature phone are not the same thing, and a feature phone may connect to the internet.
Well, as long as their eligibility/registration isn’t tossed under dubious means, there are enough polling stations where they live, they have the ability to go (as in not working or their work allows them to go), their vote sent by mail isn’t caught in a USPS black hole until right after the deadline despite being submitted long before, so on, and so on.
Here’s my tip - subscribe to a bunch of things of interest, and set your subscribed feed to top for the day. You’ll likely see a bunch of interesting posts.
Then browse all, top for 6 hours, and you’ll see some wide variety (except for days following a debate like today, that’d going to skew political heavily for obvious reasons).
You’ll find new and interesting communities to subscribe to, and make your subscribed feed all the better.
Personally I have different accounts for different interests, and for a few of them I rarely leave the subscribed/top for the day. They are more focused, and without a good multi-community feature that’s universal, its the next best thing.
Hope you enjoy it here!
I still think that’s why Vance thinks Haitians are eating cats.
So, an actual answer if you’re interested.
No, the President does not have the power to remove him. When the Post Office was reformed into USPS in the 1970’s, the selection of Postmaster General is made by the Board of Governors of the Postal Service. These board members have 7 year terms, and are appointed by the President, with Senate approval.
The Postmaster General has no fixed term, and serves until the Board decides otherwise.
There are 9 members of the Board, and no more than 5 can be from the same party. The Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General are also voting members of the Board, though there are some things they can’t vote on.
Removing requires an absolute majority - so even though a quorum is 6, there needs to be 5 votes to remove DeJoy.
No member of the Board can serve more than 2 terms, and they can’t be removed without a gross violation - misconduct for example.
So despite the spongebob meme reference reply near mine, no, Biden can’t just remove DeJoy.
The US doesn’t want that either.
Russia was bombing civilian targets from the start.