Context:
https://github.com/WinampDesktop/winamp/issues/17

Confidential Dolby code was pushed, though just some headers files.

I C Weiner!?

Install the fzf integration for ctrl+r fuzzy finding through your entire shell history:

https://thevaluable.dev/fzf-shell-integration/

(っ^_^)っ ❤️

But how does this relate to Routh?

e: Agreed on SCOTUS corruption wholeheartedly

But this guy hated trump? do you think this was a psyop like five years in the making? I mean, they can obviously try to get as much sympathy out of it as they can now and try to dominate the news cycle with it, but are we seriously suggesting this is some sort of conspiracy?

I’ve just read a book about Somme, and it’s absolutely true for that battle that surrendered enemies were killed for mere convenience - so they wouldn’t have to take them back and feed them. I read this of the British in particular, but that’s who the book was about, so.

I’m voting. Are you?

I have faith for some reason this won’t happen. If it does, I’ll reevaluate

He claimed to have voted Trump, and probably just because he was “anti-establishment” judging by his other eclectic and conspiratorial views.

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article292534604.html

I wouldn’t mourn for Trump, but I’d mourn for our country. This isn’t the right way

Conflict doesn’t equal armed insurrection or the assassination of political leaders. He can lose at the ballot box and die penniless. I’m fully aware of what a monster he is. Are we cool with assassinating other R’s? Some are just as vile if not more than him.

Where’s the line? Who gets to decide who lives and dies? You? I’m sure you’re a nice and reasonable person, but I don’t trust you with that decision, let alone a gun nut, conspiracy theorist Trump voter. How long before someone retaliates and turns a gun on [insert favorite politician here]? Was the cycle of violence worth it then?

This guy is a Trump voter who tried to kill a politician before an election. He’s a gutter person. It’s karmic that the fanatics Trump whipped up would now target him, but idk how we’re cheering for this. It’s sad, scary, and ominous imo.

Call me a bleeding heart liberal I guess.

Wearing a condom and showering are how you prevent those. There are slight to moderate reductions in a few STDs/STIs, but wearing a condom is the actual prevention method instead of a coin flip. This isn’t to mention that cutting or burning a portion of a human off should probably involve some consent.

I am not remotely arguing against subsistence farming or hunting. Hell even hunting meat yourself that you consume. I wouldn’t do it willingly, but that doesn’t make it inherently immoral.

People are detached from the method of making their meat. It is far more unpleasant than most want to think about. The animals are mistreated. It’s hard to argue they aren’t. That’s really the point

I am underestimating no one. I do not remotely doubt humanity’s capacity for violence and depravity. I am saying that we as people can choose to minimize harm and violence (to each other, animals we farm, etc)

edit: I should also point out that we are FAR past the point of “subsistence” with out meat consumption. We consume more meat now than ever before. There are many costs associated with this to our health, the animals we eat, the planet …

You are literally arguing the definition of the word “cruelty” rather than dealing with the substance. I appreciate the engagement, but this is where I’ll stop. I hope you consider the conflicts in your worldview and work toward improving the world for yourself and the beings that inhabit it.

You do not need meat to survive

Do you buy blood diamonds? Do you buy grass fed beef? Free range eggs? Do you buy fast fashion? You have agency over your choices. Just because you don’t slaughter the animals with your own hands doesn’t mean they are free from blood.

To willingly inflict unnecessary suffering on sentient beings is cruelty. This is a semantic argument that ignores reality

Farm less meat. Farm meat in a way that minimizes suffering.

The systems by which we produce meat are intentional. Just because the people who set them up and benefit from them don’t care doesn’t mean these farms can exist outside morality.

Inflicting pain on an animal to save its life is directly related to your point. Raising animals in objectively painful and squalid conditions so they can be slaughtered is not at all the same.

You are equating saving the life of a human to the torture and slaughtering of an animals. They are not analogous