He gave hypotheticals with very clear and pretty easy answers. The fact that he posed those as stumbling blocks means he shouldn’t be deliberating on anything more significant than what he should have for lunch.

“If you don’t stop committing a humanitarian crisis, we’re going to stop sending humanitarian aid!”

…

What?

OP is why we can’t have nice things. Because people will ignore things that should be obvious. So we’re left with everything softball pitched to the lowest common denominator

This is not targeted at you nor OP.

The answer for both you and OP is tied to your last sentence

so we can all enjoy fried chicken and watermelon on Juneteenth.

Why fried chicken and watermelon and why on Juneteenth? Do you eat fried chicken and watermelon as part of your normal rotation? (Hopefully, ‘yes’ because both are delicious and everyone should be afforded the opportunity to indulge)

The issue is that very evidently in both OP’s case and the one you linked that someone was given the prompts “food for celebration” and “celebration of African Americans”, generated “African American party foods”, and churned out a menu reinforcing racist stereotypes. The inquiry is “hey, where is your head at?”

Oh no, my life has become that much poorer

You’re gonna be judged as the minority that most offends them.

Because most protests are about making the lives of normal people miserable until they’re pissed enough to hold someone to task.

Are the Tories gonna care that Stonehenge was dusted, from in their mansions? Most of them would love to dig up the stones and use them as new countertops, simply as a bragging point at their parties. But normal people that care about landmarks like these will be pissed and, maybe, bitch to the government.

What do you mean “same combat”, like Amalur made some novel innovation? They’re both just 3D, third-person action combat; it’s a mechanic. This is like knocking Fallout New Vegas because it still had you shooting guns, and we already shot guns in Fallout 3.

The game looks disappointing for plenty of legitimate reasons, so let’s stick to those.

I’m curious how the sentence “There is every reason for people to believe that” gets translated to “sure, you can think that if you want [to be wrong].”

It reads more like, “I can’t say whether it’s ‘1 plus 3’ or ‘2 plus 2’ but everybody is getting 4.” The evidence is all there.

That’s certainly one way to blow someone’s back out

But…that’s not specifically about video games?

E3 cultivated an “insider” appeal that not many large cons tried to match. You could look forward to game reveals that you’d mark on your calendars.

PAX has a more indie feel and Gamescom feels much more like an actual trade show.

As a straight man, the wording in the meme is very literal. I’m not a fan but I’ll allow it.

Because American politics has become so barren of thought and nuance that even interacting with content containing specific images will be highlighted as support for that thing. So you can’t use memes with people you disagree with unless the meme is showing how you want to disrespect them.

And American politics continues to poison the internet “well” like the dead body it is because America has a lot of guns is looking more and more unstable by the day.

Hmmm.

No.

U S A!

U S A!

U S A!!

Honestly, I’m not a doctor or nothing but I’d, personally, have none, if you can help it. YMMV

Maybe that’s a sign to make less coffee, bruv

‘Console exclusivity’ is a tier of exclusivity that’s existed for years already.

…where’d he chop a tree that big? did that bastard take down all the cool, fantasy trees??

Unless you work with businesspeople. Then both parts are true.