What is it you’re actually trying to accomplish? Connect remote services to your self-hosted cloud?

Well, this “authenticated user” could be your fucking LLM and this is really concerning. Besides that a single CVE 10 is also very concerning no matter how old the affected version is.

Just look at the recent vulnerabilities it had. It just had a CVE 10 in January and March of this year.

https://app.opencve.io/cve/?vendor=n8n

It just defaults to “Yes”.

Semites is an obsolete term

Antisemitism is not a “flavor” of racism.

What’s with the downvotes? This is absolutely a valid question and a valid scientific analysis! It might be a hard pill to swallow, but porn is bad, especially for men’s view of women.

Great answer.

Today I tasked Gemini Pro to assist me code a quite simple web GUI in Python using NiceGUI and besides somewhat doing what I asked it to do it also added a bunch of childish emojis to buttons and removed my name from the project and replaced it with ‘admin’. This is a real tool that I develop for a hand full of my very real coworkers and my boss is paying Google for this shit. Next time I much rather give the task to one of our apprentices and point them to the docu then having a supposedly ‘Pro’ model do random shit I haven’t asked it to do.

Great counter argument.

So just because there is something or someone worse we shouldn’t criticise others anymore or what are you implying?

subhuman

So now we’re openly using Nazi vocabulary as well?

Not only is the tattoo not just a Totenkopf, but Platner was well aware that it’s a Nazi symbol.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/24/politics/graham-platner-nazi-tattoo-evidence-kfile-invs

Does anybody care that Drop Site’s author and founder Ryan Grim supported Graham Platner, who has a skull-and-bones tattoo resembling the Nazi Schutzstaffel’s symbol. Grim also shared posts by Sulaiman Ahmed a friend of neo-nazi Nick Fuentes. And Drop Site recently outright posted right-wing Tucker Carlson as if he is a credible source for anything. Grim also interviewed Tim Dillon, who once dressed as an antisemitic caricature of a Jew that’s “controlling the media”.

This is actually quite a good read and pinpoints the issue. (Sorry for the Reddit-link though.) https://www.reddit.com/r/GrapheneOS/comments/1s8q534/response_to_a_post_about_grapheneos_on_another/

Having read the comments I still see two major isssues with this:

1. This looks like an almost-as-secure-as-GrapheneOS fork, therefore creating a (false) sense of security, because…
2. GrapheneOS’s security is based on secure hardware (Pixel’s Titan chip) to verify the software. Only having software security without the underlying secure hardware is kind of pointless or at least well… a false sense of security.

Officially yes, but I suspect he is still behind the official social media accounts. Their tone is unchanged and I recently got blocked by the GOS account on Bluesky and immediately by Micay’s account as well.

I think it’s a lot more than just 3 features removed. AFAIK the whole hardware attestation is based on the Titan chip and you don’t have to trust the devices hardware, because you can cryptographically prove that the software is unchanged. It’s not only about the Auditor app, but the whole integrity of the OS, the boot process and firmware is secured by the Pixel’s hardware or more specific the Titan chip.

And the billions of devices can not be saved by a GrapheneOS fork because they’re mostly missing crucial firmware and generally get no updates anymore. That’s why GrapheneOS is only supporting recent devices and especially Pixel devices because they receive up to 7 years updates.

I’m all into getting people a more secure OS but I fear that a GrapheneOS fork is perceived as a secure OS when it’s actually not. The most important security features are still recent (firmware) updates and hardware attestation, verified boot etc.

I would love to know, but he blocked me everywhere.

But those benefits rely on the Pixel’s hardware. This is contradictory.