IMO the content here is the commentary on the output and not the output itself. NTA
IMO the content here is the commentary on the output and not the output itself. NTA
deleted by creator
My friends had a chearth (couch style chair) they kept outside their house in college. It was pretty questionable. TBF it came with the house when they moved in but they did use it so…
Humans have invented the wheel, we use rolling releases now.
Over 90% of quotes attributed to Einstein were never actually said by Einstein.
- Albert Einstein
Year of mobile linux
[ astronauts meme ]
Always has been
You should try NixOS, it’s pretty cool.
I usually sit on the floor
What’s a “sigma balls lmao”?
A plastic cup for milk (strong bones)
Who wants to start a flame war? NixOS is a better bleeding edge distro than Arch. Nixpkgs has way more packages than Arch.
That… is not a restriction on freedom 3. You could complain about your inability to use the rust name for anything you want but that is not the same thing as your ability to distribute modified versions of the software. It is also fairly standard practice for foss software to restrict the use of such trademarks. For example, Gnome does pretty much the same thin. FreeBSD as well. Libre Office also has similar restrictions, although they are defined more nebulously. It is not clear to me what usages are allowed with the Linux trademark but they certainly do restrict who can use it and for what and you must get permission before using it. See also, about trademarks in FOSS: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9d96e1bf-bced-48f7-b5b4-ee561e7a9348
The software is free. The trademarks are not. The four freedoms are about the software and not about trademarks. You could fork Rust and call it Corrosion, just like people have forked Firefox and called it Waterfox.
geebofadeeznutz