where does this me being 17 thing come from?

i’ve been open about my age since i first got on here. even had an asklemmy post about birthday celebrations months ago

i did the math based on years

2008-1963=45

i’m not 17

i’m a feb baby, hence the violet in my username

curious about that as well. does squirting in public count as jizzing? cause if it did i’d have a bingo🙂‍↕️

“Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!”

anything and everything goes. shitposts are supposed to be fun, unhinged, chaotic content. why would i use a smaller lemmy community when lemmy’s already small to begin with?

i really don’t get comments like this. don’t like it, move on.

Meme in question:

“nutted on someone else’s cock” - does squirting on it count?

no bingo😒 i marked with red the ones i’m not sure apply to the receiving end, and i don’t know how many guys make a bukkake

oh, sorry then

have a great day🫶

i could say the same about the weird hyperfocus on politics. but you won’t see me complain as i understand that people are passionate about different things.

i’ll keep posting what i like. you can scroll if you don’t like it.

but they let me put their cocks together to suck them at once😒

is cocks touching less gay than kissing?

there’s a non-zero chance i could get with his dad if i wanted to

that’d at least give him a real reason to go around calling me a slut

The Culkin defense never made much sense anyway. For a practical, personal example: if one of my dad’s wealthy friends was accused of child molestation by multiple children, me saying, “Oh, but he never did anything to me,” wouldn’t discredit the victims at all. As the child of a friend (and same circles), I would clearly be of a “higher status” and therefore protected.

Culkin was a famous child; predators are often selective with their victims. The argument here is that MJ targeted “lower class” children while treating famous ones well. That way, if accusations ever surfaced, the less privileged kids would be branded as money-hungry liars because the famous ones would publicly insist, “He treated me well.”

No, my point still stands.

If Trump publicly admitted that he sees nothing wrong with having sleepovers with non-related prepubescent children and sleeping with them, he’d rightfully be labeled a pedophile, because people hate him.

But people like MJ’s music, so despite the plethora of “in your face” evidence, they defend him using the same arguments that conservatives use for Trump. Frankly, any MJ defense argument could be made for Trump.

I’m beyond disappointed in the so-called “progressive” Lemmy space and will never be able to take political discussions seriously here again after witnessing this attitude. It is pure hypocrisy and double standards, and disgusting pedophile and child abuse apologia that delegitimizes and loses all credibility for any future discussions on the topic.

I can’t take any opinions on this topic from people on here seriously anymore when so many were in the trenches fighting for Michael Jackson using the same defense lines as MAGA uses for Trump: extortion, greedy fake victims, hit job by some enemy, circumstantial evidence, and no conviction, etc. People don’t actually give a shit about child abuse or pedophiles, lol.

Lemmy is a predominantly progressive platform. Which made seeing so much MJ apologia very disappointing and unexpected.

No, he was a pedo who used women as a shield/incubators. Lisa Marie Presley (his first wife) publicly said that they’d fight about having kids & MJ would tell her “Debbie will have them for me then”. It’s not about being gay.

Sperm donor.

https://lemmy.world/post/45939437

There are multiple people sharing that belief unironically…