• just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    SCOTUS can’t overrule an election outcome unless there is contention and proof. Won’t happen. Her numbers are too good, and that’s taking into account that polls only reach old people.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      SCOTUS can’t overrule an election outcome unless there is contention and proof

      They can do whatever the fuck a majority of them wants. That’s why Mitch McConnell considered stacking the courts much more important to his legacy than electoral success.

      The way the broken system works, they have the final say on ANYTHING and can only be overruled by the by now impossible constitutional amendment process.

      No matter how nonsensical or blatantly corrupt their reasoning, their judgment is effectively final.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If SC tries to force an illegitimate Trump presidency down our throats there will be hell to pay. Biden might also need to use some of his newly-acquired presidential immunity superpowers and ship the SC to Antarctica to do science research for the rest of their tenure.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If SC tries to force an illegitimate Trump presidency down our throats there will be hell to pay

          There should be but there won’t. Just like when they forced an illegitimate Bush president down people’s throats in 2000 and the powerful ignored the millions decrying THAT injustice.

          Biden might also need to use some of his newly-acquired presidential immunity superpowers and ship the SC to Antarctica to do science research for the rest of their tenure.

          Even if he’d ever do such a thing (or indeed ANYTHING that violates the rules and norms that Neoliberals consider much more important than any outcomes of following or breaking them), they made sure that what constitutes “official acts” is up to the SCOTUS themselves, thus effectively making any executive overreach by Biden just as illegal as before and any by Trump the law of the land.

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Bush v. Gore. Contention, no proof. Since when has this SCOTUS ever shied from doing something it “can’t”? Roe v. Wade. Presidents are kings.

      Sorry bud, it’s not looking good, and believe you me will I be voting. But it’s not even a question that they’re trying coup 2.0.

        • basmatii@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It is exactly the same thing. Jeb Bush and W. Bush’s campaign manager rigged the vote in Florida, same as Trump loyalists will do this cycle.

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Uh-huh. Ignore everything else that’s happened just this year, then. Ignore all the obvious preparations they’ve been making, how they’ve stacked the courts. It’s gonna work out great.