return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agoObama Responds to Heckler Who Claims Trump Wears Diapers: ‘I Almost Said That’www.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1251arrow-down19
arrow-up1242arrow-down1external-linkObama Responds to Heckler Who Claims Trump Wears Diapers: ‘I Almost Said That’www.mediaite.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squarechingadera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down22·1 month agoObvious answer here is veto.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·1 month ago 67-32 A veto wouldn’t have made a difference.
minus-squareJohnmannesca@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoYeah, that’s just enough to be a super-majority
minus-squaredarharrison@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoYou literally cannot veto anything that passes with 67 of more Senate votes.
minus-squarePieisawesome@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoActually, you can, but they can send it right back overriding his veto. It would be an empty gesture
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoYes you can. They have an opportunity to override afterwards, but the veto both signals the President’s opposition and gives members a chance to change their vote.
Obvious answer here is veto.
A veto wouldn’t have made a difference.
Yeah, that’s just enough to be a super-majority
You literally cannot veto anything that passes with 67 of more Senate votes.
Actually, you can, but they can send it right back overriding his veto.
It would be an empty gesture
Yes you can. They have an opportunity to override afterwards, but the veto both signals the President’s opposition and gives members a chance to change their vote.