Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    7 days ago

    Did she win? No? Then it doesn’t fucking matter!

    What? Should she be getting a participation trophy? Sorry, I can’t hear you over how Ukraine is being annexed by Russia.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Also it wasn’t a toss up. Trump won every single swing state. All of them. This article is some mad copium. Prepare to see more of it over the next few days.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Aw man it was so close. I mean it wasn’t, but she had a fierce competitor. The demented overweight felon rapist child molester won, but it was just the better choice overall

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I know right. They act like Harris was some plucky underdog. When in reality her party is only one of two that govern the most power country on earth.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d argue the opposite.

    The fact that Americans are possibly still voting for someone who will bring in the Fourth Reich if elected, over the first female president is a sign of just how badly Democrats have dropped the ball. ESPECIALLY after Jan 6th.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I 100% agree except why is it that “Democrats dropped the ball”?

      Democrats aren’t voting for a fascist. Their politicians are not enabling a fascist. The Democratic voting base hasn’t been bamboozled by 30+ years of obvious propaganda pretending to be news.

      Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball… on purpose.

      Democrats work on harm reduction because we don’t give them enough votes to make meaningful changes. A 1 or 2 vote margin isn’t enough to vote around the moles like Manchin and Sinema.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball… on purpose.

        There is a literal industry built on lies

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          To be fair, just being a corrupt industry full of scumbags is actually progress when it comes to religion. Go back 100 years let alone 500 and it was more like its own authoritarian political party. now it’s just hobby lobby with more private jets, and…well, that’s a good thing. I don’t ever want to have to expect the Spanish inquisition.

        • hraegsvelmir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s really tiring seeing you guys trot out the “it’s all leftist’s fault for not voting for us!” line again and again when the actions of your candidate give it away for the lie that it is. Leftists cannot simultaneously be the cause of every Democratic defeat, yet too insignificant a group to merit any consideration in party platform.

          Go back to your handlers for better propaganda, this one doesn’t work on anyone with a pulse.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            They actually can be the cause of defeat while still not having power in the party. There’s not enough leftists to win the primaries, but there are enough that if they don’t vote in the general it can cause a loss.

            Then again, with the sheer number of Democratic voters who voted in 2020 but not 2024 I don’t think it’s just the leftists.

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not the Democrats’ fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded, brainwashed losers in this country who fall for every bit of propaganda the GOP puts out. Politics shouldn’t be about culture wars but that’s how the republicans get votes.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        It is the Democrats fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded losers in charge of the party though.

      • hraegsvelmir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        You could certainly say the Democrats should have been able to come up with a better outreach plan rather than running the same old plan that hasn’t penetrated into this group for the last several elections. It’s not as though the culture war nonsense and insane rightwing elements of the party are novel factors, such that the Dems can shrug their collective shoulders and say “Hey, we did our best, be we were flying blind into the unknown.”

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The Democrats are responsible for 50+ years of neglecting working Americans that created the culture you’re complaining about.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        You are right about stupid people falling for stupid shit, but that’s not why democrats lost. Trump got less votes than he did in 2020, that 70 million who voted for Trump are just people who love what Trump says.

        What made democrats lose are the 16 million votes Biden got that Harris didn’t get. The GOP didn’t magically make those votes disappear, those missing votes is the failure of the democratic party.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think both can be true. That she cleaned up the situation is a testament to her skill as a candidate, and the fact this situation happened is in no small part an indictment of the Democratic party, in which she’s among its most senior leaders

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        no she didn’t. she had a window of positive energy she just tanked. jesus did we watch the same candidate running? lol

        • blakemiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          What evidence are you using to support your belief that she tanked? That’s a surprise to me and I’d like to understand more.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Gestures at map of results. Do I need more?

            How about the fact her campaign was mired (sp?)not in what the her admin would do for Americans but instead of how shes not trump and how shes willing to silence a minority group just asking her to enforce american law? A group supported by a demographic thats very hard to turn out… Young folks.

            How about the fact she repeatedly committed herself to doing the same shit as biden’s admin? An admin with historically low approval ratings?

            Im sorry your candidate lost I truly am. America is officially worse off as a result. But her problem was turnout and the only shit she ran on was shit most people already have in their states that were possible wins for her.

            Look at Pennsylvania weed legalization is basically assured. They have abortion peotections… Etc. so what exactly did harris offering voters in those states?

            • blakemiller@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well let’s be real honest with ourselves here. Her platform was fine and her campaign was executed very, very well. But she had only, what, 107 days to pull it off? Economists agree that her platform would have the best impact on the country, but she or anyone who would have taken her place were all swimming upstream against inflation. And since we’re being honest here, we both recognize that the Fed, not controlled by the executive branch, are the ones responsible for righting the ship. And Biden did everything he could from his chair up to and including working across the aisle in GOP majority house, and only failed when Trump intervened for sake of an election year talking point.

              The map is the outcome, but it’s not evidence of any campaign tanking. She is intelligent, empathetic, and very well spoken. But the settling dust is indicating that the outcome was driven by a number of factors beyond her control.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Her platform was not fine. The few policies she put forward were either limited to incredible minor subsets of the population (capping price of just insulin, a minor payput for first time how buyers in very limited areas, a tax cut that barely puts a dent in the rise of the cost of living due to inflation), or were things most states have already done themselves.

                Not to mention speed running to the right. A genocide, etc.

                The number of days was not the issue. It was her complete disregard for the plight of the middle class struggling on food/housing and arabs literally watching her and bidens admin murdering their families.

                Never mind the fact that she was one of the individuals that was gaslighting americans over bidens mental decline.

                She had plenty of time to plan her campaign if she hadnt been too busy gaslighting people.

                • blakemiller@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Just to be super clear, yes we were watching different candidates then. The country needs to walk a very nuanced path if we want to continue the recovery started by the Fed (interest rates) and Biden (IRA and CHIPS). Don’t get me wrong: Biden deciding to run for reelection was the worst possible decision he could have made. The second worst: dropping out 107 days from the election. I’m sure the private discussions about his decision were passionate, but of course she’s not going to publicly lay her boss out like that. That’s not realistic to expect her to undermine any progress Biden. You privately disagree and publicly commit. You do that until the circumstances change. The DNC is absolutely to blame. Not Harris though. It was as good as it could have been given the duration.

                  And then there’s the elephant in the room: she does not exist in a vacuum. We had a front row view to a horribly misogynist, criminal, fascist wannabe since (checks notes) 2015. People comparing these 2 and selecting to risk the world order just to save their regressive social views are also to blame. Because remember: all economists agree how dangerous his plan is.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Look at Pennsylvania weed legalization is basically assured.

              This is primarily because every bordering state has recreational and they’re losing tons of tax revenue.

              But this did get me to check on my state election results and I found a tiny silver lining in that Democrats won both the state senate and representative races.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                This is primarily because every bordering state has recreational and they’re losing tons of tax revenue.

                yes and what did it bring harris’ campaign as an incentive? seriously think about this. every campaign issue she put forward were all things most states that care already have or were getting this election what voters would it bring to the table for her if they were going to get them anyways why show up for harris. fuck this isnt hard.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Bernie Sanders

        Pete Buttigieg

        Or if they could have approached a very popular celebrity such as Dwayne Johnson or Taylor Swift and asked them to run.

        Even Andrew Yang could have produced a better result if he made a better campaign pitch than focusing his solely on leftist pipe dreams that will bankrupt the country such as UBI.

      • Aoife@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Look blaming the democrats is done not because the republicans aren’t to blame, but because blaming them is sort of pointless. It’s like blaming terrorists for the shit they do. Yes, it’s their fault. Yes, they’re morally reprehensible. So what? Are you going to spend time trying to come up with detailed arguments for what they could’ve done better? No, you look to the material conditions, people, and organizations responsible for fighting them, and for making sure people aren’t desperate enough to join them, because their job at least in theory is to do better. I blame the democrats because I believe they could have done better. I do not have even that small grain of hope when it comes to the republicans.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s honestly unreal that Trump is even in the race, let alone in a position to pull off a possible win. After everything that has happened. I try to keep a positive spirit in general, but it’s not easy to be optimistic on behalf of the US right now.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not unreal at all. I don’t understand why time after time people underestimate what monsters the average American is.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, now that it looks like Trump is actually going to pull it off, we’re all in for a world of fun over the next four years. We might actually discover just how monstrous things will get.

        • fourish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Four years? You’re awfully optimistic that he’ll ever leave if given power again.

              • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Sometimes cults die with their leader sometimes they don’t. JD has no charisma and pedo-supporters don’t even like him (they prefer child rapists to couch fuckers). Time will tell.

                • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Oh, I agree. I think the amount of energy lost, when Trump dies, will be a huge blow to the MAGA movement. Will it be a coup de grace? I fucking hope so. However, if they get their project 2025 governmental structure into place, I think it will be hard to dethrone the GOP, even without Trump. I also believe that is the true hope behind that platform. They know their cult of personality is on a timer, so they are hoping to get things set-up, where they still have complete control, regardless of how motivated the cult is.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Its a historic win for accelerationists I guess. Viva la revolution.

          Sometimes I wonder if the centrists are crypto-accelerationists, because they always run to the center for nonexistent votes like clockwork, and predictably always lose.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Harris will be the lightning rod for democract anger, but the DNC are ultimately the ones to blame for allowing the first convicted president.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why is no one discussing Dems have lost the senate and given a bigger majority in the house to Republicans. Even without Trump they are bound to control house and the senate.

    Stand by for nothing happening for the next 2 years or worse.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Edit: If Kamala loses, and it looks like she might, I’m blaming her and her campaign. She could have swooned the beliefs of America if she had ran on something better.

    Her political skills are trash.

    Kamala gained the most approved points after Biden gave her the race.

    Since then, her approval rating has plummeted compared to her early numbers, and I think this is because Kamala doesn’t really know what to believe.

    You can see it with Tim Walz. There was a lot of momentum when Kamala took up the mantle, and that momentum was carried through once the Walz pick came out. Then, around the DNC, the campaign’s tone shifted, crawling back to the ethos of the Biden administration. I think this is because Kamala couldn’t decide to break away from Biden or not, and because she waited so long, she was around a lot of the same people in the Biden administration, and those people influenced her platform. You can also see this with marijuana and how she changed sides in her time between being DA and senator. Also, how she didn’t really have a solid platform to begin with, which should have been established right when Walz was picked.

    I’m not here to call her out as a flip flopper. I’m pointing to how she could have steamrolled this election, but chose not to. It saddened me so much when the campaign had silence Tim for his views and policies when those views and policies were the key to victory.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s truly embarrassing as hell to have a Democratic party that can’t absolutely crush a clown like Trump. The Democratic establishment isn’t just out of touch, it’s weak as fuck. Yes, this is on Kamala, but it’s also on Obama, and the Clintons, and Pelosi, and Schumer, and the whole “anyone but Bernie” coalition. This is the consequence of running to the center instead of tackling wealth inequality head on.

          • zqps@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I appreciate the input, but the things Vaush criticizes as shortcomings are positions about other nominally socialist or communist countries. The video I linked isn’t about socialism, it is about the US government.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s totally fair, but I think that serious issues with Second Thought’s philosophy should be understood when viewing any of his material.

              I also wasn’t talking about Democrats failing to get things done. That’s a small part of it, but it’s mostly about who they are, how they message, and who they listen to. If the Democrats achieved everything they set out to do, I seriously doubt the situation with income inequality would be any better. In fact, Democratic initiatives have often made it significantly worse.

              I think we all benefited from Bernie’s runs in 2016 and 2020 resulting in a marked change to Democratic party philosophy, but it’s not nearly the change the Democrats needed to be able to effectively message in the world we live in.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s what 50+ years of neoliberalism does to a population. It’s a world wide phenomenon.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Any cortortion you have to in order to not ask the leadership any questions whatsoever, or question their motivations or strategy even a little bit. You’ll go far in corporate life.

  • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 days ago

    I would have said this aged like milk after Trump’s landslide-even-the-popular-vote victory, but even milk doesn’t sour this fast. This aged like unrefrigerated shellfish.

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    No it’s not, liberals tried the age old tactic of getting minorities and the working class to vote for neoliberals that have devastated their well being for 50 years because the GOP is racist, and for some reason it didn’t work this time.

    Y’all took the wrong lesson from COVID and 2020. It wasn’t that voters were going to continue to put up with Democrat’s fealty to the right and corporate donors. It was that COVID was so unprecedented that they held their nose one last time. ,

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Close, but no cigar does not preserve actual democracy, unfortunately.

    Calling yourself a democracy, and being a democracy are two very different things. The first proper word in North Korea’s official country name is “Democratic”, and bear in mind Russia holds “elections” as well.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here’s a list of progressive policies both foreign and domestic that supermajorities of both democrats and republicans support.

    What’s that? You’d rather support genocide and brag about being endorsed by Dick Cheney?

    You do you, I guess……. You’ll still get your weird blue maga votes i suppose.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I know, Harris couldn’t have bent over more for reactionary conservatives that weren’t raving mad Trump supporters if she had tried.

      Then acting entitled to minority voters’ support even going so far as to scold some of them like black men.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    What’s more amazing is that no one is saying “is America ready for a woman president?” this time around, like they were in 2016. It’s refreshing, but also sad that it took this long.

    Never fucking mind. At this point I decide whether suicide or applying for a green card is the easier option.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It was young men, especially Latinos, who broke hard for Trump. Not Boomers.

          White college educated men are the only group that increased in share for Harris. Trump even got a higher share of women than he did in 2020.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    The fact that you thought I would vote for a WOMAN over a Rapist Felon who Promised to create HUGE Financial Hardships while killing my Daughter is LAUGHABLE!