• vatlark@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    This pretty quickly became a well liked post with lots of interaction and is remaining mostly civil.

    It’s hard to argue that this post doesn’t break the new rule for “avoid politics”.

    Should this post stay?

    How do people here feel about the “avoid politics” rule? Should it be rewritten in some way to allow this post?

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ll phrase it like a shower thought:

      “Avoiding politics is about as useless as avoiding economics, math, science, or the arts; they permeate everything we do. We even use them to define what it means to be human. We might as well avoid breathing.”

      I think avoiding partisanship and incivility might be more productive, but it has the problem of being more vague and requiring judgement, thus requiring more effort to enforce fairly and consistently. I don’t think there is an answer that will satisfy everyone. Avoiding politics may be a good rule for this community, even if it’s pointless.

      • vatlark@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Thanks for the feedback. I would argue that determining what post counts as a shower thought (rule 1) is a lot harder than determining what posts are about politics.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it should stay because I disagree with the rule. “No politics” is impossible (everything is political), so this rule boils down to acting like the status quo is fine.