Summary

President Biden became the first sitting U.S. president to visit the Amazon rainforest, emphasizing the global urgency of combating climate change.

During his historic visit, he called protecting the environment “a fight for humanity, citing achievements such as rejoining the Paris Agreement, boosting climate financing to $11 billion annually, and advancing green energy through the Inflation Reduction Act

He announced new conservation efforts, including $50 million for the Amazon Fund, and declared Nov. 17 as International Conservation Day.

Biden urged leaders to prioritize both environmental protection and economic growth, leaving a climate-focused legacy amid concerns over President-elect Trump’s rollback plans.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s irrelevant. We are talking about whether the Democratic Party intended to do what they said they would do.

      They said they would forgive student loans. They were blocked by republicans.

      You are acting like democrats are to blame for republicans actions.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They said they would forgive student loans. They were blocked by republicans.

        The deciding votes were from Democratic senators.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Manchin and Sinema. Why are you trying to blame the Dem party for people that don’t vote along party lines. That’s an obvious bad faith argument.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Manchin and Sinema. Why are you trying to blame the Dem party for people that don’t vote along party lines.

            They did their jobs. They voted like leadership wanted. There are always just enough Manchins.

            The people gave Democrats a majority. They found enough no votes. Like fucking always.

            • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Manchin and Sinema exist because any politician can just claim to be democrat and not vote along party lines. For you to act like it is some conspiracy by the democrats to not follow through on what they worked for is a bad faith argument.

              Isn’t it more likely that republicans, the group that actively blocks all democrats out then up to it?

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Isn’t it more likely that republicans, the group that actively blocks all democrats out then up to it?

                Which also would be a conspiracy.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 minutes ago

                  There is evidence of republicans trying to stop Democratic legislation. There is none of the Democratic Party trying to stop the Democratic Party

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 minutes ago

                    There is plenty of evidence of Democrats trying to stop progressives. Why would that be limited to progressive candidates and not progressive legislation?