Workplace violence has always been a thing in the US. As a phenomena, it predates the era of school shootings. It’s so common that I feel comfortable predicting that this man’s motives were a personal grievance, not class warfare.
There may be a personal grievance, but what are the chances that if he had better work conditions, that the personal grievance he had would have driven him to this?
Workplace violence has always been a thing in the US. As a phenomena, it predates the era of school shootings. It’s so common that I feel comfortable predicting that this man’s motives were a personal grievance, not class warfare.
There may be a personal grievance, but what are the chances that if he had better work conditions, that the personal grievance he had would have driven him to this?
Depending on the grievance it might still be “class warfare” depending on how loosely you define it.
While true, how many of those workplace incidents involved someone from the executive level?
I mean if school shootings are acceptable and there’s the chance for many many victims, America should quite happily accept CEO murders to continue.
It has literally been taught in schools for decades, what did people expect?