New Community, I’ve created some seed posts!
Carnivore - The ultimate elimination diet
Purpose
- lifestyle
- food
- Science
- problems
- Recipes
- Sustainability
- Regenerative lifestyle
Rules
- Be nice
- Stay on topic
- Don’t farm rage
- Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!
“Insufficient” despite the fact these are reputable sources. I’m done debating with a troll.
Here are more studies on the topic though if you’re interested in reading them:
Many credible physicians recommend Whole-food plant-based diets (WFPB).
Nutritional Update for Physicians: Plant-Based Diets
Ten years of life: Is it a matter of choice?
Low-carbohydrate diets and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: two cohort studies.
Plant Foods Have a Complete Amino Acid Composition
Mortality in vegetarians and comparable nonvegetarians in the United Kingdom
Comparison of Nutritional Quality of the Vegan, Vegetarian, Semi-Vegetarian, Pesco-Vegetarian and Omnivorous Diet
Beyond Meatless, the Health Effects of Vegan Diets: Findings from the Adventist Cohorts
The Health Advantage of a Vegan Diet: Exploring the Gut Microbiota Connection
Comparative metabolomics in vegans and omnivores reveal constraints on diet-dependent gut microbiota metabolite production
High compliance with dietary recommendations in a cohort of meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, and vegans: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition–Oxford study
A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial 1,2,3,4
Milk intake and risk of mortality and fractures in women and men: cohort studies.
Vegetarian Diets and Medical Expenditure in Taiwan—A Matched Cohort Study
Energy and protein feed-to-food conversion efficiencies
Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change
Current global food production is sufficient to meet human nutritional needs in 2050 provided there is radical societal adaptation
Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship to Land Use, Water Use, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Implications for Future Food Security
calling me names won’t change the facts.
only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn’t actually support the claim that you’re using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don’t make the same very strong claim that you have.
edit: “them” was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.
if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I’m not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I’ve seen in months.