rglullis@communick.news to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoHachyderm admin: if we were to cost of the people working on this instance, it costs $1.50/user/month, $8.50/active user/month.hachyderm.ioexternal-linkmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down112
arrow-up174arrow-down1external-linkHachyderm admin: if we were to cost of the people working on this instance, it costs $1.50/user/month, $8.50/active user/month.hachyderm.iorglullis@communick.news to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 hours ago we really want to get rid of the Elon Musks Then promote Bluesky. This one could succeed.
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newsOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-244 minutes agoBluesky is only marginally better, just like every other startup that has not achieved a dominant position, if/when they reach critical mass they will become a rent-seeking player, just like every other VC-funded company. Their protocol is open, but not really decentralized. It is very clear that they want to become a single global indexer of the whole social web.
Then promote Bluesky. This one could succeed.
Bluesky is only marginally better, just like every other startup that has not achieved a dominant position, if/when they reach critical mass they will become a rent-seeking player, just like every other VC-funded company.
Their protocol is open, but not really decentralized. It is very clear that they want to become a single global indexer of the whole social web.