• SomeDude@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, she shouldn't have. Wanna know why there was such an online campaign push for her retirement?

    Because she was the tie-breaking vote in the Senate judiciary committee, and Mitch McConnell blocked her replacement.

    If she had retired, all of Joe Biden's executive or judicial nominations, would've been dead in the water.

    You should be glad she kept going to confirm as many of his picks as long as she could, because now problems are on the way.

    • Farias@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      She should have retired over a decade ago. She’s responsible for her part of all this mess because she kept a seat that could have gone to someone younger for over a decade longer than she should have.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is if she was in the committee. What would happen if she was no longer a senator? Is the Senate going to keep an unbalanced committee?