• Blamemeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe, but it feels more corporate and sterile than just a different tone. Like they wanted more but had to reign it in.

    • Eochaid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There's literally no evidence they ever considered another tone. They were clearly going for a Star Trek tone, not a space opera.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering all their past recent games had those aspects at least somewhat… It's odd that they sterilized it so much in comparison.

        Compare that to BG3 where there's like… Full on sex and people can explode into a bloody mess

        • Eochaid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Okay, but just because they're not titillating the desires of teenage boys doesn't mean they "sold out" or "got more corporate". They've been pretty consistent about presenting their creative vision for the game since the beginning.

          Also, you're premise is wrong. I just shot the hell out of someone iin the game and there were absolutely blood splatters all over the wall and floor. Have you played the game, or are you meming influencers?

          That said, I would never consider Beth games to be particularly risque. They've always faded out sex scenes. Oblivion and Skyrim aren't particularly bloody games. Fallout's bloodiness is more in line with the IP and considerably tame compared to Obsidian's games.

          Maybe you're thinking of mods. I dunno.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is blood splatter, but it looks silly, when you loot things off of dead bodies they still have the same suit/helmet/whatever left on their bodies you supposedly just looted.

            I've put over a hundred hours into the game, I'm not a teenager, and the game is definitely more tame/sterile/corporate in many aspects compared to previous games. Remember bloody mess in Fallout? Or the fact you can goo enemies with laser weapons? Yes fallout under beth is definitely more tame even then compared to Fallout 1 and 2 but still Starfield has none of that.

            There's dibellla in Elder Scrolls, and cannibalism, and skeletons (im mot talking about like necromancer skeletons, literally bones for corpses of prior-dead, in Starfield there are corpses but it's always the "frozen over" look, even on warm planets with atmosphere where decomposition should definitely have taken place instead)

            Need I say more?

            • Eochaid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The blood looks way better than vanilla Skyrim did…

              Also you've gone from calling the game "corporate" to "tame/sterile" which seems to be an admission that you now understand this was a purposeful and consistent creative choice towards building a "positive sci-fi" world ala Star Trek. A choice they were pretty clear to market and a choice you disagree with. That's fine. It doesn't mean it's a bad game, it just means you weren't paying attention and bamboozled yourself into thinking this game was ever designed for your sensibilities. Not every game made by a studio will be the same - especially when it's a new IP. Hell, Tango made Evil Within and Ghostwire then turned around and built Hi-FI Rush.

              Oh well. But since it's a Beth game, you can be rest assured that there will be a ton of mods to help your realize your dream of watching people die and decompose in the most realistic way possible. Heck, there are probably already a bunch that do.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Lol alright bud

                I disagree they said it was Star Trek like at all, this is most definitely not Star Trek utopia the game, you've got Neon as a shining example of the corruption and corporate espionage aspects (not that it's a bad thing at all, just not in line with classic trek ideals)

                I know newer trek has moved away from the utopia aspects a lot, partially why I don't enjoy them nearly as much.

                I do think (like with most beth games) the game itself is a great framework for modders to really make the game their own.

                Oh, also, I never said it was a bad game, I just noticed they sanitized it a lot compared to what I was expecting, it was noticable to me as some who who has thousands of hours in prior beth games, modded and unmodded.

                • Eochaid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Wait, so first you were complaining it's not dark enough and now you're complaining it's too dark and not utopian enough? Bro…

                  Also, I said they were trying to capture the tone of a positive sci-fi story like Star Trek, not create star trek fan fiction. The game world shows significant progress towards solving various social, equality, and health issues, but we haven't quite gotten rid of money, and as such, greed. For this reason, we still have economic disparity, corporate evil, pirates that do evil things for money, and a monopoly banking system that uses it's power to use an abuse it's opponents.

                  Furthermore, there's plenty of people who have a problem with an overbearing singular government and want to do things their way - thus why the freestar collective and crimson fleet exist.

                  Its earth + 1, better, but still flawed. Which is honestly, a lot more realistic than star trek ever seemed to be. Perhaps they wanted to show a "missing link" between current humanity and star trek humanity. There's progress, but there's still work to do. Which, given the lack of aliens, its probably a good move to make sure humanity still manufactures drama.

                  Regardless, the theme and tone of the game can be best described as "hopeful and wide-eyed optimism", which is very different from the distopian unease of Fallout and sweeping fantasy epic of Skyrim and, starfield was very clearly marketed as such from day one.

                  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No no no, I'm saying your claim that they said it's supposed to be like Star Trek (which I never saw mentioned at all) doesn't make sense.

                    Though I agree with your latter paragraphs 👍

                    I'll add, I'm not a hater and have absolutely defended the game in many aspects (check my post history if you'd like), I do think there are valid criticisms and odd choices though. I'm at 177 hours with it, played through all the side quests I could find and started ng+, made it most of the way through again but now I'm already at the point of, "eh, theres not a whole lot left to do but rehash what I've already done for slightly better rewards"

                    I have high hopes for the mod community as they have been able to consistently breath life and add addition QoL fixes to Bethesda games for years, and I am massively appreciative of them giving me more reasons to jump back into some of my favorite games :)