return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoSouth Florida man drives SUV into Tesla protesters, cops saywww.local10.comexternal-linkmessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1248arrow-down16
arrow-up1242arrow-down1external-linkSouth Florida man drives SUV into Tesla protesters, cops saywww.local10.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squareOutlierBlue@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoHe drove up on the sidewalk.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoWere they obstructing the sidewalk? I could see Florida Lawyer making a case from that.
minus-squareA_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agowhat is a sidewalk but a road for filthy poors and peasants to do their un-christian walking on?
minus-squaremetaldream@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 months agoThey probably had a permit from the police so the answer is most likely no. Can’t really argue that they’re “obstructing” the sidewalk when you gave them permission to be there. That would hold up on Fox News but not in a courtroom.
minus-squareOutlierBlue@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoTo traffic? A normal pedestrian is “obstructing” the sidewalk to a car. Vehicles have no right of way there!
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoNo, not to vehicles, to pedestrians. The IRONIC point being made was, even that would be sufficient.
He drove up on the sidewalk.
Were they obstructing the sidewalk? I could see Florida Lawyer making a case from that.
what is a sidewalk but a road for filthy poors and peasants to do their un-christian walking on?
They probably had a permit from the police so the answer is most likely no. Can’t really argue that they’re “obstructing” the sidewalk when you gave them permission to be there. That would hold up on Fox News but not in a courtroom.
To traffic? A normal pedestrian is “obstructing” the sidewalk to a car. Vehicles have no right of way there!
No, not to vehicles, to pedestrians. The IRONIC point being made was, even that would be sufficient.