Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agoSarah Silverman and other authors are suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement, alleging that they're training their LLMs on books via Library Genesis and Z-Librarywww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkSarah Silverman and other authors are suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement, alleging that they're training their LLMs on books via Library Genesis and Z-Librarywww.thedailybeast.comArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square64fedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.ml
minus-squarenothacking@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year ago if asked by a user prompts chatGPT to summarize a copyrighted book, it will do so. So will a human. Let’s stop extending copyright law. Also, how you know it read the book, and not a summary of it, of which there are loads on the internet?
minus-squareSpaceToast@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThis is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work. Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.
minus-squareAndrewZabar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.
minus-squareDouble_A@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOnly bad can result from it, just because some company is making profits?
minus-squareSpaceToast@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI don’t know how anyone can be anti AI. It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense. Can you provide an example?
So will a human. Let’s stop extending copyright law. Also, how you know it read the book, and not a summary of it, of which there are loads on the internet?
This is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work.
Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.
I don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.
Only bad can result from it, just because some company is making profits?
I don’t know how anyone can be anti AI.
It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense.
Can you provide an example?
Just wait and see.