Complex internet services fail in interesting ways as they grow in size and complexity. Twitter’s recent issues show how failures emerge slowly over time as relationships between components degrade. Meta’s quick launch of Threads demonstrates how platform investments can compound over time, allowing them to quickly build on existing infrastructure and expertise. While layoffs may be needed, companies must be strategic to maintain what matters most - the ability to navigate complex systems and deliver value. Twitter’s inability to ship new features shows they have lost this expertise, while Threads may out-execute them due to Meta’s platform advantages. The case of Twitter and Threads provides a lesson for companies on who they want to be during times of optimization.

  • Vlyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s also a shitty take because it hypes up Meta. Which basically took Instagram (handling billions of users posting text, images and videos) and creating Threads by turning images and video off. It’s the same user accounts too.

    That’s like Google creating YouTweet by taking their YouTube platform and reducing it to video comments only. Then praising them that they managed to launch a text based service in 2023.

    Why not actually talk about Mastodon instead?

    • tjp@readit.buzz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because OP posted about a business lesson.

      It only “hypes up” Meta by using it as a contrast to demonstrate how Elon shat the bed.

      Maybe stop calling it a shitty take? You clearly don’t understand it.

      I don’t want to fight though, I won’t be responding here again.