• Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish I could be excited for this but after no longer being able to use it for SMS and shoving crypto in it… Well, I just don’t wanna use Signal anymore :(

      • verysoft@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        SMS support got more people to use it, its easy to convince friends/family to swap if they can do all their regular texting in there. I understand why they removed it, but I think they did it way too early, they still needed a larger userbase.

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re trying to move from using only one messaging platform (SMS) to two (SMS+Signal), then I understand the friction. If you’re like me and you have five other messaging platforms anyway, then a sixth makes no difference. This has never bothered me, but it’s one of the reasons I have not moved my mother onto Signal — it’s added complexity that she’s not really going to understand.

        That said, I never enabled SMS in the Signal app and I wouldn’t even if it came back. RCS is available now, and until Android provides third-party app developers the ability to make RCS clients, it’s a dead end.

      • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because if the username is a phone number, it is just very convenient. If someone I know switches then I keep the entire conversation with them and just continue. If I want to encourage someone I know, I can just tell them about the features they’ll get with Signal rather than trying to sell them a platform which kind of sucks on desktop.