I can’t really think of a reason for that as Reddit is hated somewhat equally by “both” sides of the spectrum. It’s just something I find interesting.

  • A2PKXG@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, it’s a fairly good way to differentiate between collectivist and individualistic ideas.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a whopping two sides of a scale, which doesn’t unambiguously refer to “individualism” or “collectivism”, also referring vaguely to associations with dozens of other issues. So it’s actually a worse way of describing those ideas than saying “individualist” or “collectivist”, because you’re no longer even specifically saying that. And “individualist” vs. “collectivist” is already a terrible way to categorize all political ideas. What does abortion have to do with collectivism? How about zoning laws, or environmental protection?

      This is the issue…left vs. right has nothing to do with any one issue, in fact it actually serves completely to distract people from the specifics of issues, because instead of actually figuring out the nuance of something, people fall back on their group identity and go, “well if the leftists hate it, then it must be good, because fuck the left!”

      • A2PKXG@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Environmental protection is collectivist. It’s what is best for everyone. (Including future generations).

        But abortion is a good exception.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But what’s best for every individual is what’s best for everyone…