White House calls for legislation after ‘alarming’ proliferation of Taylor Swift deepfakes — Social media networks also need to do more to prevent the spread of the images, said press secretary Kar…::The White House said sexually-explicit AI-generated images of pop star Taylor Swift were concerning and that Congress should consider legislation to address fake, abusive images that are proliferating online.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Not better, just easier for the plebes to use.

    There’s a world of difference in effort and intelligence needed between photoshopping a particular person’s head onto a body doing what you fantasize and just typing in “Taylor Swift sucking on a huge black cock while being fucked from behind” and having an AI art program just spit out the wanted result.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, actually better. Sure, there’s been photoshopped images since forever, but Marilyn Monroe stripping for you while saying your name? Never been a thing…

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        From the little I’ve seen of these images - they are actually pretty hot and creative (as far as porn goes). it’s in an environment you usually couldn’t make porno in and in a “normal” music video vibe, not the creepy porn vibe. That’s why it went viral.

        There are tons of AI generated taylor swift porn images but this quality makes it something quite different.

        Porn that is not produced by or modeled on any specific human - complete fantasy - is morally quite good through. Fascinating to think that if in the future the AI ever becomes sentient, it will already have been in a long term intimate sexual relationship with a lot of humans.