• CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Then users need to spin up their own instance, right? Then all their posts stay backed up if they choose?

    Seems like a mediocre problem to get bent out of shape enough to move to a centralized platform.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      No. A better analogy would be like phone number portability. You can “own” your number, and if you want to change your company you can take the number with you.

    • s0ckpuppet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Completely impractical for most people but this advice gets unironically thrown around all the time. And evangelists still wonder why regular people think the fediverse and particularly Mastodon are convoluted af.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think people are confusing centralized with federated. Federation has benefits but Mastodon is not decentralized. There is duplication of data but it’s not the same.