Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 months agoCentrist Benny Gantz is quitting Israel's war Cabinet, citing frustrations with Netanyahuapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down17
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkCentrist Benny Gantz is quitting Israel's war Cabinet, citing frustrations with Netanyahuapnews.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squaregoferking0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·4 months agoNo they could not. The USA keeps helping Israel and runs interference in the UN.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down6·4 months agoThey sure could and would. They make most of their own arms. The biggest thing the US is doing is holding off a larger war. They do not need the ammo we supply, it just makes it less challenging for them.
minus-squaregoferking0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·4 months agoNo the US is helping hold off the rest of the world from doing a peace keeping mission to stop Israel from the genocide it’s doing. It doesn’t matter if we stop weapons if we don’t also use soft power to stop the killings.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·4 months agoWho in the world are you imagining? I’ve seen no one step to the plate.
minus-squaregoferking0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·4 months ago Who in the world are you imagining? I’ve seen no one step to the plate. That’s a reasonable question calling for a reasonable discussion. However, I’ve given up trying to find one on this chat board. Starting to see why this keeps happening to you if that’s your logic
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·4 months agoWhy? Because I ask a reasonable question? In order to have peacekeepers you need countries to supply them.
minus-squaregoferking0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·4 months agoBecause the UN has been trying to do peacekeeping only to be vetoed by USA https://www.npr.org/2024/02/20/1232636543/un-security-council-gaza-cease-fire-vote https://www.npr.org/2023/12/08/1218332312/israel-hamas-war-us-ceasefire-veto-un
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·4 months agoThe UN does not have its own forces, it must aquire the blue hats from member countries. So, the question remains.
minus-squaregoferking0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·4 months agoYou don’t think any of the countries voting in favor of the ceasefire would add troops?
No they could not. The USA keeps helping Israel and runs interference in the UN.
They sure could and would. They make most of their own arms. The biggest thing the US is doing is holding off a larger war. They do not need the ammo we supply, it just makes it less challenging for them.
No the US is helping hold off the rest of the world from doing a peace keeping mission to stop Israel from the genocide it’s doing.
It doesn’t matter if we stop weapons if we don’t also use soft power to stop the killings.
Who in the world are you imagining? I’ve seen no one step to the plate.
Starting to see why this keeps happening to you if that’s your logic
Why? Because I ask a reasonable question? In order to have peacekeepers you need countries to supply them.
Because the UN has been trying to do peacekeeping only to be vetoed by USA
https://www.npr.org/2024/02/20/1232636543/un-security-council-gaza-cease-fire-vote
https://www.npr.org/2023/12/08/1218332312/israel-hamas-war-us-ceasefire-veto-un
The UN does not have its own forces, it must aquire the blue hats from member countries. So, the question remains.
You don’t think any of the countries voting in favor of the ceasefire would add troops?