Rimu@piefed.social to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agoLemmy devs are considering making all votes public - have your saygithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square814fedilinkarrow-up1823arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1805arrow-down1external-linkLemmy devs are considering making all votes public - have your saygithub.comRimu@piefed.social to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square814fedilinkfile-text
Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoNot privacy-protecting. You can easily deduct the voter by enumeration.
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 months agoA privately-stored salt would fix that :)
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoThen what is the point of hashing the data? Just use an UUID. Anyway, this is all pointless bike shedding because the activity needs to be associated with the actor, as it can only be accepted if the signature can be verified.
Not privacy-protecting. You can easily deduct the voter by enumeration.
A privately-stored salt would fix that :)
Then what is the point of hashing the data? Just use an UUID.
Anyway, this is all pointless bike shedding because the activity needs to be associated with the actor, as it can only be accepted if the signature can be verified.