• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      What?

      Surface ships are in constant communication with stuff…

      You can’t just find a signal in the middle of the ocean. Musk can find a starlink signal tho, because he can see what Starlink connects to and it’s gps location.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        101
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but if they go on mission and “go dark” then you still have this starlink thing that may or may not be disabled by the person smuggling it on board. It may also be connected to official things if the owner has bad intentions, or if someone else who does finds it and co-opts it.

        There is a lot that could go wrong with unauthorized radio transmission equipment on a warship, and not all of it is obvious.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can’t connect a star link to siprnet.

          The worst a bad actor could do is constantly transmitting location and other combat data.

          • ggppjj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You can’t connect a star link to siprnet.

            Can you connect a computer? Because if so, that same computer can then be connected to the starlink, no?

            I know absolutely nothing about secure government networking, I’m just kind of assuming that something has to be able to connect to both individually and also simultaneously.

            • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              sipr is very strict about what it is letting connect to it. Which is why you rarely hear about breaches. Notable incidents like Manning or Snowden both involved usage of physical media, which has been severely restricted since. Plus Snowden was an admin, and not on SIPRNet, but some NSA systems.

              To add, SIPRNet is entirely isolated from NIPRNet or the Internet.

              • ggppjj@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Well, the Starlink could be connected by an admin to a computer that is connected to SIPRNet, right? It exposes itself as just a router.

                I mean, assuming the Starlink was brought on board by someone with authorization to be on board, any possible adversarial situation would necessarily be an internal issue to begin with.

                Personally, I think the most likely answer involves an Xbox.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Nothing Sipr is going to have a wi-fi. At least, not at the tactical level. God knows what goes on with secure cellphones and stuff. However a Sipr computer is still a computer and if you hook in the wrong cable then you’ve breached the network. Any bad actor knowing where the ship is and with sufficient information is going to try and drop malware to the router. That malware would load to any computer attached and if it happens to find itself on a secure computer it then attempts to phone home or cause havoc.

                  Which is why hooking a green cable into a red computer usually means you unhook it, power it down, cart it off to IT, and then hope the punishment isn’t too bad. (Ranges from push ups to half pay for an honest mistake.)

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Depends on where your sensors are and how much dispersion the dish has. If you are flying a surveillance plane into the “beam” then you can passively spot the ship.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You say that like Elon is personally looking at that information.

        Presumably, there would be a large number of people at the company with access to that information, all of whom could be bribed or otherwise persuaded to share it.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can’t just find a signal in the middle of the ocean.

        Uh, this was the primary way the Allies defeated the U-Boats in WWII.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        No they actually do go dark sometimes for exactly this reason. Of course there’s always some signal source but it’s the difference between lighting up like a Christmas tree and running a single IR light.