Now do a standard pax
command.
Now do a standard pax
command.
“Single pixel” is an interesting way of putting it.
That comment made me imagine a bunch of people sitting in a movie theater, watching a film that consists of nothing but a giant square that keeps changing colors and brightness, with the soundtrack from another film. The film is called “Blindness Simulator.”
funneddic (US)
funnettic (UK)
Windows contains a lot of stuff proprietarily licensed to Microsoft, so they don’t have an option to turn all of it into free software even if they wanted to.
how is that even allowed
lobbyists, I presume
Just because he’s not a Doctor of Medicine doesn’t mean he’s not a doctor. A Doctor of Chiropractic is exactly that, regardless of its questionable merits.
A medical doctorate would be more relevant to a neurologist.
I was under the impression that the assertion that chiropractic neck manipulation causes vertebral artery dissection is often suggested, but that evidence of such a causation is inconclusive. I certainly believe it, but I can’t assume. Chiropractors may twist the inconclusiveness into suggesting that such neck manipulation is safe, but that’s a fallacy.
dd
does not stand for “disk duplicator”. That’s a modern backronymization that doesn’t reflect the original general usage of the command which is to “convert and copy”. Efficiently (with respect to I/O) copying raw data is only one of its intended purposes; it also converts text encodings.
But dc
is a reverse polish calculator Unix program. It’s even in the Bell Labs’ Unix 1st edition manual.
C was built mostly to abstract from assembly
That’s actually not true; rather, many modern architectures are designed to allow languages like C to be compiled more easily. Old architectures don’t even have a built-in stack.
Ed Is The Standard Text Editor
ed
, ex
, and vi
are all standard, required text editors in the Single Unix Specification.
I got all the landscape ones correct—except for one—by applying my limited knowledge of art technique.
I look forward to finding out how it’s actually much worse than meets the eye. [emphasis added]
It this schadenfreude because you hate Canonical and their Snap system?
Why does philosophy constantly twist things into an over complicated mythical mess, and then act like it’s some novel insight?
I cannot stand that either, but this sort of pseudo-profundity is more common in some specific schools of thought, rather than philosophy in general.
Does a tree falling in the woods with nothing to hear it make a sound?
It’s probably № 1 on my list of stupidest questions. The answer is yes.
And GPL compatible, so a fork of tmux
could be GPL-licensed on top of the ISC license.
DRM certainly can’t be fair as long as it’s illegal to circumvent.
Or a total preorder