![](/static/66c60d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
ubuntu
ubuntu
why do we negate chromeos we are 10% at least so there we really are
because Ubuntu has been fantastic for a long time now
in my experience the browser went through a poor engineering phase just as Chrome was getting good, and that continued for quite some time, the mobile browser took a very wayward turn a few years ago
oddly this happened at the same time as Rust and Firefox OS appeared which i think are phenomenal achievements
so Chrome ate Firefox’s lunch and the series of weird CEOs have compounded that by attempting to cover it up with progressive sounding PR
as a kid, current favorite music or radio
as an adult, science podcasts, movie directors commentaries (ridley scott, francis coppola highly recommend), select rain sounds and currently the watergate senate hearings
oh i didn’t know Mint supported ZFS and nvidia wayland install etc?
the ubuntu installer has always been the key difference for me specially with zfs and multi-monitor/fractional scaling/nvidia setups that it has configured well over the years where other installers leave you with a lot still to do
it’s very easy to make those changes to ubuntu, but i guess for a new user it might be a significant barrier
amphetamines?
NixOS is perfect for server OS. hope in future a little more orchestration tools make it even easier to manage clusters of NixOS instances
oh really? i must be misinterpreting this then
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1964/81
Article 37
yeah that was horrible but there was diplomatic immunity involved
they ergonomically have 3 different niches although laptop can also be desktop
a bunch of progressive sounding MBAs smearing google money on their careers
you can address these things using CBT and a nice therapist, those flinches will fade
and what kernel would you say it and android runs? relevant?