What does lower top 10% mean?

They should be more than named

Nah, I’m hungry right now

Fine, I’ll give it the tongue test and aggressively mash each bite into the roof of my mouth before I swallow it.

Rules don’t matter if there’s no one willing to enforce them. The strongest legal argument in the world means nothing to people who don’t care about the law.

Never in your life? I always assumed asexual meant very rarely horny, not literally never. Is that common?

I agree, Brian Thompson should never have been allowed to murder so many people with his psychopathic level of greed.

I’m not sure what conversation you think is happening but it has been my experience that everyone is talking about the thing you’re saying no one is talking about.

There’s a user with the name “SatansMaggotyCumFart” or something like that. I think the person you’re talking to is assuming your name is a play on that since it looks and sounds similar but isn’t gross.

Careful, you’re very close to acknowledging that men have problems of their own and we don’t do that. That’s the patriarchy talking.

Not for long. Capitalists about to do more stripping in that caldera than your mom does on Tuesday nights down at the Beaver Barn.

I really like that the link at the bottom of the page says “check out more stuff you should be using” but that URL takes you to a page where the curl article is the only link.

“more coming soon. Or not. I don’t owe you shit”

A majestic site indeed. Bravo sir.

Good luck with that

People don’t click on articles with headlines like “Idiotic People Still Doing Nonsensical Things”

Same. I haven’t seen what I would call a new feature (or at least one worth a shit) in a decade. What the hell do I need 5 cameras for? Plus, the obsession with making devices thinner is so annoying. I’m still mad they took away my headphone jack.

An authoritarian pretending to be agrarian

It’s surprisingly difficult to find soup that isn’t chock full of nasty stuff. I just want some veggies and maybe a bit of meat in broth or some kind of chili. Why is that so difficult for companies to make?

I spent a couple of hours reading these through jmail the other day. Some of the conversations were pretty interesting. The best that I found outside of the ones widely reported on were:

1. A thread in which Michael Wolfe (sp?) and Epstein are discussing Epstein’s legal troubles and Trump’s involvement in it. Wolfe refers to Trump as “the real villain” in all of it.

2. Epstein is talking to a woman with a redacted name trying to set up a meeting. He invites the woman to wait for him in his home and she replies something to the effect of, “I would but I don’t want to show up and find Trump in your house again”.

3. Epstein is speaking with (I believe) a reporter for the NYT. Thomas Landon or something like that. They discuss Trump’s involvement with Epstein in broad terms and then the reporter asks Epstein, “why don’t you do the country a favor and release what you have on Trump” so that he presumably goes to prison.

Yeah it makes sense it’s just funny looking. Like the devs skinned each character and made a pelt rug out of them.

The fact that texture files of characters are flattened out never fails to get a laugh out of me. I get the function of it but they look so ridiculous it’s hard not to giggle when you see it