what you should be disappointed in is not being able to make an argument without strawmanning multiple times.

what you’re doing is just refusing to cooperate on language that’s already obvious and widely understood. it’s bad faith.

I think they were being sarcastic

based on how people use them, not ordained by the gods of language. people say pedophile to mean someone who rapes a minor.

“hey son, wanna monitor each other’s masturbation habits? you know, for God.”

Iran was still a Muslim country when it was a democracy and women were free. until the US toppled their democratically elected leader and the following revolution was exploited by fascists.

did you ask if Republican voters realize something? realization requires using your brain, something that would’ve prevented them from voting Republican in the first place

well just in time for the supreme-court-approved executions of the anti-establishment politicians. imagine not getting this after Bernie had massive support despite all the efforts of the Democratic party, and after the orange cunt winning just by paying lip service to being anti-establishment…

seriously, that’s all you needed to do. not actually do anything, not help anybody. just fucking lie and pretend you give a shit about people grievances about being crushed by the system.

you couldn’t even clear that bar on the fucking ground, and lost to a cunt who’s known for firing people, not paying for anything, and shitting on a gold toilet. because you’re physically incapable of criticizing systemic oppression.

ok Sweden wins this one

that sounds crazy. that makes the idea of federation pointless imo… thank you for the response

could you elaborate for people who don’t use it?

She’s referring to the orgasm

I don’t think it’s really new. Just short for dragged through the mud. super old phrase + ellipsis

Did you choose your username because you think that’s what everyone calls you?

lol.

“Hi, may I talk to the representative? yeah I was gonna ask for military action against the USA. the United States, yes… of America. mm hm. I’ll hold”

instinctively I was gonna say shut the fuck up you’re not helping but thinking about it, they actually might. if there’s one country that might influence the US politicians more than Israel it’s gotta be $audi Arabia. I mean after 9/11 fucking Iraq got invaded but Saudi Arabia somehow barely got mentions.

no, that’s the 22nd amendment.

of course with this scotus the constitution doesn’t mean anything now.

I disagree. “It’s ugly” is valid criticism. It has the same value as “needs better/more appealing graphics”. You’re just annoyed it wasn’t sugar coded. In fact I’d argue the former is more valuable than the latter because it doesn’t beat around the bush and more importantly it points to a problem rather than the solution.

As a designer I find that most often customers don’t hit the mark by trying to design the thing themselves, telling me exactly what they want, essentially trying to do my job for me. Hearing the customer’s problems with it to figure out a solution on my own as a designer is better a vast majority of the time.

“I don’t like it” is bad. “I think it looks awful” is better. “I hate the colors” is best. I don’t really care about wording, I care about the information I get.

it’s not though

it didn’t work in South Korea. have you seen incel forums? they’re fueled by their imagined persecution by women. this will only solidify their positions.