We did but then you lot started ringing bells.

Tbf, were fucked too.

For sure, I totally agree with what you’re saying. I was only using the word in the 40k version where nearly everything is hersasy, not the sensible version of the word youre using.

Something I always love to add to these sorts of threads:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Nine_Angles

It expresses the view that the current aeonic civilization is that of the Western world, but it claims that the evolution of this society is threatened by the “Magian/Nazarene” influence of the Judeo-Christian religion, which the Order seeks to combat in order to establish a militaristic new social order, which it calls the “Imperium”. According to Order teachings, this is necessary in order for a galactic civilization to form, in which “Aryan” society will colonise the Milky Way.

It’s beyond heresy.

After blast off, the static T forms a new a new acronym of evil with the infamous L, G and B.

Wake up sheeple.

Yeah but, if it was remotely enjoyable, then you might make 2 or maybe even 3% less profit for the lazy, workshy scroungers who own the company.

We can’t have that now can we?

I get the feeling, I really do. However, I can’t think of many things that would radicalise someone more than losing all their money or being buried under a pile of debt. Being these sorts of types, they’ll only go one way. On reflection, I’m sure you recognise the very specific and historically recognisable tinder box.

I mean, it still might not be immoral. They can all get fucked. Just, maybe not in that specific way is all im saying.

Not your fault of course but it was always a stupid name. It isn’t arrested or inhibited, during a stage of development, resulting in an underdeveloped outcome (retarded). Like a fire retardant door stops the fire developing, as it would usually on doors. In the case of this drug, the release is inhibited, as its, presumably, a pro-drug.

They could have called it “long lasting”, “pro-drug”, “pro”, “inhib” or “slow release” and these would have all been accurate descriptions. However, retarded isn’t accurate. They chose it anyway though.

Yeah, you’re thinking of America for the first part.

I mean, it would make sense, if The UK hadn’t been at war with Germany and Italy for years before the Axis powers invaded the soviet Union. The day they invaded the soviet union, Britain started buying up all the wool in the world they could lay their hands on, to get at the nazis in every way possible. Despite being nearly starved into surrender and on rations nationally, the UK still sent huge amounts of aid, weapons and materials to the soviet Union, with the Arctic convoys.

Nazi Germany also gave the UK the chance to sit it out and keep their empire, as they wanted to go east and would rather use their resources on that, instead of fighting the royal navy.

The UK chose to fight the Nazis. They were drawn in by an alliance but who could have done anything about the UK changing their mind? No one could have done a thing.

So no, the reason was that Hitler was a cracked out junkie and he was preferable to one of Germany’s many capable field marshals being in charge instead.

…well, technically that would be considered a ceremony of sorts.

Yahweh (who later became "god) is definitely a man, cock and all. He used to be depicted with horns or as a golden calf, with a huge, oversized novelty dong.

Theres a reason moses came back with extra commandments, the second time.

I mean, the guy is just falling over himself to demonstrate his ignorance of the war. British high command had loads of very easy opportunities to kill Hitler but chose not to incase someone who wasn’t a speedball addicted, half crazed walking liability took over instead.

He should sell his instant work-teleportation device for money instead of working

I mean if anything, surely that justifies their claim of wage slavery even more no?

I mean, after all, their problem is that they want more workers, so they can make more money. Letting people work less defeats the point.

It’s our fault for ever thing they would try to fix their problem by making their own problem worse.

Lol, as if they needed any help with sounding like a mens gay porn outlet.

Thanks but I didn’t need it. Maybe try the explanations without pictures next time. Thats probably where you went wrong.

Your problem is that you presumed to be saying that to someone who didn’t know anything about fallacies and not someone who knows them better than you. So, now you’ve gone and made a fool out of yourself. Even funnier that you’ve doubled down on your fallacy fallacy and had to resort to such pathetic deflections.

Please carry on though, you’re hilarious.

It might well have been, had i made that claim.

I agree completely and i respect you giving context. I hope you can understand, its not that common that people realise that.

I can understand that. I imagine the main cause is what you’ll find if you look into “operation gladio.”

Bless your little heat. Like I said, I remember when I first discovered fallacies too. So, I understand why you think they’re news for other people. Ironically though, again, you forgot the fallacy fallacy.

As in, even if you weren’t wildly wrong and falling foul of the very fallacy you claim to see, it still wouldn’t make my position wrong.

So, rather than post things you clearly don’t understand, why not engage the subject?

Lol jk, anyone reading this will know why you can’t.