• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        My wife had a forgotten bill get sent to small claims instead of actually contacting her. As soon as it hit the small claims court system she got inundated with ads from law firms offering to represent her

      • CO5MO ✨@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would agree w this. Had a parent get into a minor fender bender & had to help field calls from multiple injury lawyers.

    • usrtrv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exchange contact info with someone after the accident then that someone is extremely petty. That’s my guess.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve never understood why things like this have to be a part of public record. Traffic accidents, traffic citations, bankruptcies, buying a house, and even getting divorced.

    All of those are very personal things that should never be a part of public record. And even if they are, the PII should not.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Simple improvement: Add a fee to access the personally identifiable information. And make the record of accessing the information public.

      Not perfect, but better.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I believe some things (like DMV records) are fee based. But the fee is nominal and wouldn’t stop any predator from doing bad things if they are so inclined. The only thing adding fees does is to financially incentivize keeping the data online and accessible to anybody who pays.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          But the fee is nominal and wouldn’t stop any predator from doing bad things if they are so inclined.

          It might slow down people from doing it in bulk, though.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That wouldn’t fix anything. There would be a site reselling it for a lower price or a large subscription fee for a specific area.

        Almost anything made by governments is public domain so it’s legal.

            • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Accurate. I both misread your comment and I have a bee in my bonnet about a $20 fee to take pictures of something you can examine for free.

              • Kairos@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                They do that because they can. Write a letter to your mayor or executive of whatever municipality that is.

                • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Technically, it’s not been my municipality that’s charged me, but those around me and where I work. I don’t vote there. My town didn’t exist when the people I’m researching were making records. And at the state level, it comes up every few years but dies in committee. Last time was in 2020, when it died due to the pandemic changes everyone’s focus. I’ll ping my local congresscritter and see if it can be revived–the person advocating for change recently retired, sadly.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Each one of these events is easily shown to have good merits for being public record. Even ignoring the obvious case of “we want to track what the police/courts were actually doing”.

      Traffic accidents

      Occurs in front of your property and cause some amount of damage to your stuff that officers didn’t outline in any reports. You want to be able to figure out who did it so you can send them the bill/sue them. Hiding these records doesn’t make sense. Other obvious uses would be to find out where someone went/is missing, eg if someone died.

      traffic citations

      You’re attempting to hire someone for a job, part of that job is some amount of driving. Being able to lookup if they have any record of driving poorly would be due diligence you’d expect a company to do. Hell getting into an Uber or Lyft… You might want to lookup your driver. You could be surprised.

      bankruptcies

      Hire someone to do something related to finances in your company? Or to file your taxes? Might want to actually double check they’re not idiots on their own dime either. Someone asks you for a loan, or any other financial related stuff. Records of them defaulting are important.

      buying a house

      Your dog ran up to me and bit me, then ran away. Being able to get the property details can be highly important.

      getting divorced

      Can trigger a number of things. If divorce has any kid related issues… and one parent no longer has rights to the child… Schools/doctors can validate that one parent no longer has those rights without just blindly trusting random documents one parent provides.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You make mostly good points — I still disagree, but I can at least see your side.

        The divorce and kids thing though is not what you think it is. Divorce and child custody agreements are two separate legal things and child custody agreements are thankfully not a matter of public record.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Divorce and child custody agreements are two separate legal things and child custody agreements are thankfully not a matter of public record.

          And yet I was able to pull my parents Divorce from decades ago and in those documents were details about who has rights to me… I think this is likely a state by state thing. Though my name was never directly mentioned.

    • spookex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Say that under any thread about any billionaire and watch your comment get double digit downvotes

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t like the existence of billionaires anymore than the next reasonably-sane pleb does. But someone’s financial/social status should never be a consideration to their constitutional right of privacy. You’ll just have to find some other way to harangue them for their behavior.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why? To publicly humiliate a person? Not everyone is evil; people fall on hard times. It happens. A lot. Why should they be further harassed by predatory practices of being offered loans after they’ve hit the rock bottom of their financial world? Because the first thing that happened when I filed for bankruptcy was to be offered a mortgage loan.

        • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because you’re asking a court to let you not pay back a bunch of money you borrowed. Is that not reason enough? I’m not sure what you taking out another loan during bankruptcy has to do with that.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    These calls might be from lawyers. Check your mail and see if you are getting mail from lawyers. They are all trying to beat each other to get you to sign with them.

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is why having a virtual number is good - my google voice number catches the overwhelming majority of the spam

  • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You can also block calls from unrecognized numbers. Doesn’t stop them from being able to leave a voicemail though which is both good and bad

    From that screen-> three dots -> settings -> blocked numbers -> block calls from unknown numbers.