We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the …

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Unluckily, yes.

      There are only 3 independent browser engines left: Firefox, Chromium and Safari. And Chromium derives from Safari, so the only true alternative is Firefox.

  • underthesign@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on, because I’m personally very bored with my kids’ schools and related services sending out emails and forms with links that simply won’t open in FF but are clearly expecting Chrome or Edge where they work fine. Yes, this is on the lazy developers, but if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups then this is the stuff they must fix.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      What you’re talking about is webcompat and is a very complicated issue. Also I’ve talked to some Mozilla devs who gave me multiple examples of Chromium rendering something wrong, and they’d have to intentionally break Firefox to render it incorrectly too, just so the end user would get a more consistent experience. Of course these issues happen more and more when things are only tested for one browser.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      I can’t think of a single example where a web page doesn’t work on FF.

      if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups

      Lol. I remember when FF was the most popular browser.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If your site doesn’t work on Firefox your site doesn’t work. As web developers your job is to develop applications for the web not for one specific browser. This goes double for essential services.

      • Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My job requires login to most internal websites via Microsoft Azure AD SSO using Kerberos authentication using passwordless, smart card auth.

        This switch happened this week. Up until yesterday I was 100% Firefox until this.

        Firefox for MacOS is not able to do this. I spent an hour or so looking for solutions. Chrome on MacOS also doesn’t. Safari does and now I have to fucking use Safari FFS.

      • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s some BS. You and i both know that Chromium has the largest share in the browser business, so it makes sense from a development perspective to develop websites that will reach the most people. It’s on Firefox to optimise their browser so that it can run these sites as well.

    • fxdave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works…

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Almost like it does work on Firefox but for some reason they don’t want you using it. Honestly it’s so damn weird, why do that? Is there some incentive for them?

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Okay that’s fine, but when websites are effectively writing

      if user_agent_string != [chromium]
           break;
      

      It doesn’t really matter how good compatibility is. I’ve had websites go from nothing but a “Firefox is not supported, please use Chrome” splash screen to working just fine with Firefox by simply spoofing the user agent to Chrome. Maybe some feature was broken, but I was able to do what I needed. More often than not they just aren’t testing it and don’t want to support other browsers.

      The more insidious side of this is that websites will require and attempt to enforce Chrome as adblocking gets increasingly impossible on them, because it aligns with their interests. It’s so important for the future of the web that we resist this change, but I think it’s too late.

      The world wide web is quickly turning into the dark alley of the internet that nobody is willing to walk down.

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Can you send me an example? I don’t think I ever really encountered those sites and I use FF almost exclusively for ~20 years.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Its a frequency of use thing, and also some required sites. Examples are sites hosted by schools, government, or workplaces.

        Although most people using Firefox aren’t aware of spoofing the client to look like chrome, so that might need to be talked about more.

        That all said, I don’t have problems with any required usage, the only ones I have an issue with are on my phone, using mull, some sites payment forms won’t load or work correctly. Taco bell is pretty bad for that and then the app wouldnt work either for a while. I also run grapheneos though so its hard to say what’s the cause there.

        • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Hm, okay. Maybe it’s just a US government page thing then. Here in Germany firefox is still at 20% and used to be the standard browser until 5-6 years ago, so maybe pages are still optimized for it here.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It varies state to state here as well. Someone in Georgia might have way more problems than someone in Minnesota. Its hard to generalize the US in that way. Sort of like the EU being a group but each country separate.

    • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Firefox can’t fix all the broken sites in the world, but they do investigate issues reported to https://webcompat.com

      You can help by reporting sites that don’t work for you.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I encounter this very infrequently. I think I only have 1-2 examples at work. It’s not a huge deal for me to spin up a chrome for those one or two occasions.

      • Damaskox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I recall I didn’t get some sites working on Chrome either, when Firefox fails me 😅

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          This is also true. The majority of the time when something doesn’t work on Firefox and I try to go to Chrome, it doesn’t work there too 😂

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Honestly I’d say the Internet isn’t safe, and it’s because of Google, fuck you Google. It’s not just the wine I’ve been drinking, it’s true dammit.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Also Firefox mobile has nearly all of the extensions as the desktop version so it’s more similar across all of your devices. Personally, I use LibreWolf on desktop and Mull on mobile, but they’re just tweaked versions of Firefox with some bloat and telemetry removed and preconfigured to be more private.

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    When was chrome or chromium safe?

    Bloated memory hole in the last 10yrs.

    The way it goes about Sucking up resources convinced me to switch to Firefox completely long ago.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes it was performance that first got me to switch too. But now I have plenty more reasons.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Why would anyone use that browser though? Besides all the rounds of shit it went through, the CEO seems like a nutcase. First he does anti-lgbt political donations, not just once, and has to resign from Mozilla among outrage after only 21 days as the CEO. Then he tweets uninformed shit about covid and has his staff remove criticism on reddit. Sounds like a real champ.

      • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 minutes ago

        I mean I write Javascript, also his crestion so theres that.

        I know some gay people who love Javascript and its always funny to remind them what the original creator of Javascript did

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s addressed in the article. The brave CEO has stated they will continue to support manifest v2 as long as the needed code remains in Chromium. He made no promises what happens when it is removed, though (“I don’t write checks of unknown amount and sign them”)

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        So that means they are just supporting it as long as it is easy to do, and that they are not brave enough to fork chromium.

        • cum@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          They’re already a fork of Chromium… Also it doesn’t matter much since they use the Google extension store, which disabled uBO.

          You could probably install and handle a manifest V2 extension by installing the xpi file manually. But as a developer, the users who would actually do this is a small fraction of the previous user base.

          So how do you justify your limited manpower to be spent on that increasingly obscure user base? It may as well be removed anyways at that point.

  • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I might try uBlock Origin Lite, then if it doesn’t work very well then maybe I’ll just use Firefox

    I guess Google are betting that only a small segment of power users will switch to Firefox, while the mass of ordinary people won’t be bothered enough to switch.

    • Khrux@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is definitely a selfish opinion but people who block adverts or torrent being a small percentage of users can be a good thing.

      If they lose even 5% of their userbase to Firefox over this decision, they’ll find a way to make grand modifications to Google search and YouTube in a manner that stops you blocking ads from alternative browsers, and while I’m happy swapping to an alternative search engine, it’ll definitely becometedious to sidestep Google’s gaze.

      But if it’s 0.1% of people who swap due to this, and Google already don’t care about the small percentage they lose to Firefox then I would rather sit under the radar and not be cracked down on.

    • Madis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      We will now [Oct 9] begin disabling installed extensions still using Manifest V2 in Chrome stable. This change will be slowly rolled out over the following weeks. Users will be directed to the Chrome Web Store, where they will be recommended Manifest V3 alternatives for their disabled extension. For a short time, users will still be able to turn their Manifest V2 extensions back on. Enterprises using the ExtensionManifestV2Availability policy will be exempt from any browser changes until June 2025.

      https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/mv2-deprecation-timeline#october_9th_2024_an_update_on_manifest_v2_phase-out

      So there is no single date for normal users, but June 2025 is fixed for enterprise (and expected date for Brave, Vivaldi)

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        is ungoogled chromium affected i use that as a secondary browser for some extensions

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Yes, by default every Chromium browser is affected. It is just a matter of

          • whether they want to extend it to the enterprise time (which Edge and Opera won’t do IIRC)
          • whether they’d try to keep it working after enterprise time (maybe Brave and Vivaldi, but it could take a lot of effort)
          • whether they even have an alternative place to download extensions from if CWS takes MV2 extensions down (Brave has some workaround for few extensions, not sure about others)

          Maybe there will be some devs working on Ungoogled Chromium to keep the support, but they also have to think where users would even get the extensions from.

          • Mwa@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Ohh okay I wanted to try bromite on pc bcs it has a inbuilt adblocker but it broke some my extensions