A federal appeals court has tossed an Amarillo woman’s death sentence after it found that local prosecutors had failed to reveal that their primary trial witness was a paid informant.

With a 2-1 decision, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals last week sent Brittany Marlowe Holberg’s 1998 murder conviction back down to the trial court to decide how to proceed.

Holberg has been on death row for 27 years. In securing her conviction in 1998, Randall County prosecutors heavily relied on testimony from a jail inmate who was working as a confidential informant for the City of Amarillo police. That informant recanted her testimony in 2011, but neither a Texas Court of Criminal Appeals or a federal district court found that prosecutors had violated Holberg’s constitutional right to a fair trial.

  • goldfish_brain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I agree that there shouldn’t be a death penalty. I also think that any life sentence should always have the opportunity for parole.

    But some people need to be removed from society for the sake of the community. Releasing serial offenders just guarantees more victims.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are plenty of countries with a 20 year max doing just fine. They usually have an exception for the criminally insane. Anyone else should be getting out at some point.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I also think that any life sentence should always have the opportunity for parole.

      Oh god, no. I’ve seen too many true crime shows to know that some people would go back to killing as soon as they get out.