Yeah but then the billionaires wouldn’t get to buy countries.
Have you considered I need my jets to take off from my yatch though?
Gosh, we forgot you even exist, sorry man
deleted by creator
I’m not surprised. It would probably take some collaboration, so it’s not necessarily going to happen.
I think the authors forgot that people aren’t sims.
Yeah but we’re not living for people
Prerequisite: first you gotta eat the rich
Almost as if commodity production-based economies aren’t there to provide for the people but to make profits and waste resources. It’s a shocker
The headline is a bit misleading. The authors give a range from 30-44%.
Very interesting conclusions on economic growth and extreme poverty. When an economy grows, the basic necessities might become too expensive for the poorest in the country.
The headline is a bit misleading. The authors give a range from 30-44%.
Their abstract mentions only 30%. That would mean the authors themselves are misleading in the abstract.
Provisioning decent living standards (DLS) for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use
Well it would be if that were the goal. But the real goal is to make rich people even more rich. And as always: Number must go up!
You all trying to tell me that, all along, we didn’t really need to reduce the birth rates and let the natural selection cull all those innocent people?
Site doesn’t load.
