It’s simple. You’re critizing the company for reporting two separate opinions/lies/whatever it was. Those reports are accurate. The content of the quotes from them may not be.
I know you know that, but I decided to type it out with more words just to mitigate any “nuh uh” bullshit.
Lol you’re out of your mind. You know we can scroll up and read? You start with criticizing Reuters, then criticized Zeppo while also talking down to them because you refuse to do what you’re asking of others.
It’s very not.
So you just conveniently opted out of quoting the last part, chose to argue about that choice, and you’re going to triple down?
Motherfucker I will **quadruple down __ ** on the fact that the additional context does not make it any more clear, that’s why I didn’t quote it.
It’s simple. You’re critizing the company for reporting two separate opinions/lies/whatever it was. Those reports are accurate. The content of the quotes from them may not be.
I know you know that, but I decided to type it out with more words just to mitigate any “nuh uh” bullshit.
I criticized no one. And you know I didn’t. I’m blocking you now, troll. Bye!
Lol you’re out of your mind. You know we can scroll up and read? You start with criticizing Reuters, then criticized Zeppo while also talking down to them because you refuse to do what you’re asking of others.