Loduz_247@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoUS, Australia, Canada, Philippines stage naval and air force manoeuvers in disputed South China Seaapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down13
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkUS, Australia, Canada, Philippines stage naval and air force manoeuvers in disputed South China Seaapnews.comLoduz_247@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·1 month agoThe only one disputing it is China. Everyone else seems to stay in their lane.
minus-squareJojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoEveryone who disagrees with China is also disputing it, that’s how dispute works.
minus-squareFundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNot really, there are a lot of overlapping claims that involve multiple other countries. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea
minus-squareHappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·1 month agoI mean, according to China they are staying in their lane and we’re not. I disagree, but there are two perspectives.
minus-squaremindlight@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoNo, there’s not just two perspectives. There are multiple perspectives and all but one align.
minus-squarems.lane@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI agree with the other poster, if 4 nations consider one way and 1 considers another, that isn’t ‘two perspectives’ that’s ‘five perspectives’ with four of them agreeing and one outlier.
The only one disputing it is China. Everyone else seems to stay in their lane.
Everyone who disagrees with China is also disputing it, that’s how dispute works.
Not really, there are a lot of overlapping claims that involve multiple other countries. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea
I mean, according to China they are staying in their lane and we’re not.
I disagree, but there are two perspectives.
No, there’s not just two perspectives. There are multiple perspectives and all but one align.
I agree with the other poster, if 4 nations consider one way and 1 considers another, that isn’t ‘two perspectives’ that’s ‘five perspectives’ with four of them agreeing and one outlier.