• Kamala Harris’ campaign is demanding that microphones stay unmuted at the next debate.
  • It’s a break from Joe Biden, who insisted on microphone muting at the June 27 debate.
  • It indicates the vice president thinks outbursts from Trump would end up benefiting her.
  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    What happens if he just doesn’t stop talking when his turn is over? I thought that was a lesson learned from 2016 or something

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trump has cognitively declined since 2016 and is increasingly incoherent and nasty. I think the Dems are gambling that many voters aren’t watching his stump appearances so this is a good way to expose him to voters.

      I think its too big a gamble and mute him. I think he will expose himself enough on his own turns to speak.

      • Mak'@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I just hope none of this is being planned with the idea that it’ll change the opinion of his most ardent supporters, because he’s said a lot of incoherent and nasty things, and it doesn’t appear to have hurt his chances. Hell, those most negatively impacted by his policies are lining up to vote for him again, to “save” the nation. What are words in the face of that?

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          In the margins are people who will peel away and at least stay home. The people who haven’t seen him speak but think they like him based on the curated perspective from Fox News, etc. there are people who will listen to him unfiltered for the first time in a few years and it will be the last straw.

          • Etterra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s almost certainly directed at the fence-sitters and undecided. Those kinds of people are so confusing, especially in the present day of info overload. I mean how have you not figured these two out yet? Are you living in a bunker, or are you just that wishy-washy? Like WTF.

            It’s more important to energize the base - which I believe is why they did the DNC like they did. The more people vote overall, the better the Dems tend to do. And dragging everyone out of Biden’s post-debate despair is critical for them.

    • dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Came here to say this. How will they shut him up? The people who came to hear him talk will want to hear his word salad gospel, no matter how long he yammers for. She won’t be able to get a word in.

      And based on what happened with Hillary Clinton, there should also perhaps be a demand that he stay put at his lectern and not be allowed to walk around the stage/behind her…

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think how poorly his recent ramblings have gone… That’s exactly what they’re hoping for.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      The more he talks, the less time they will have to ask questions and the less likely foreign policy will come up in an environment where “shut up” isn’t met with cheers.