This happened to me in 6 grade and the teacher was like annoyed bruh when I confidently raised hand to give a more accurate answer. Maybe she thought I was showing off the way she reacted
- 47 Posts
- 99 Comments
LifeLemons@lemmy.mlOPto
Greentext@sh.itjust.works•Anon discovers cigarettes (Edit: Anon discovers addiction)English
31·11 months agoOOP?
LifeLemons@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I switched from macos to Linux because it can't stop babying users and being unnecessarily restrictiveEnglish
2·1 year agoI meant through a graphical user interface. Was saying in view of an average user.
Although it’s true that I wasn’t aware of this commands existance when writing
LifeLemons@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I switched from macos to Linux because it can't stop babying users and being unnecessarily restrictiveEnglish
71·1 year agoThere are many different signals the OS sends to applications which are kinda like “Can you kill yourself?” or “Please kill yourself” or “I will kill you” to close it. In computer teminology, there is “close”, “terminate” and “kill” types of signals. These are used so that applications can have time to perform closing tasks (like saving) when neceassary and if they misbehave, just “kill” it.
Now both windows and linux have these types of signals. In fact every OS has it.
I beleive this is the reason this meme exists:
When the user tries to shut a app in windows (throught close button or task manager) windows will wait and not give any option to immediately kill the app. Hence some apps don’t close even after using end task. Only if the app freezes for some time will it give the option for force quit,no other way(edit: it exists). In linux, its the same as windows and limux waits for app to close. But the difference is that option to kill is available anytime in linux and basically gives the user full control. Although kill option in linux may be hidden as a way for users not to use it unless necassary as applications may not like it.Shutdown process of both OS is same, they wait for all apps to shut by semding “please close” signal and if they misbehave, option to “shutdown anyways” will be shown to the user, basically killing all apps.
The meme is not correct and is just a steorotype of different OSes. This steorotype comes from how people normally experinece different OS culture and practices. Both OSes have same process of managing apps. Both OSes will wait for process to close if it freezes and give option to user to force quit.
SIGKILL in the meme is coreect only for the right panel of the meme and the left panel is actually a SIGTERM (or something else which means “please close”, don’t remember)The only thing the meme should emphasis is how the user is given full control to do in linux (even deleting the kernel) while windows is careful to not let users do something stupid.
Edit: Killing apps in windows can be done on demand through cmd using
taskkillcommand
I think you are everythingsexual
That ghost is wife material
Yes, infact I sometimes downvote my own comment if I feel like my comment is shit
For this you would need an app (could be a web app) which lets you interact with lemmy as a mastodon user. The problem here is the UI and the format of the data. Currently format is something can’t really help.
But find a UI app which lets you comments and follow through any mastodon/lemmy instance and display posts in lemny style.
LLMs are just matrix arithmetic which has a lot of parameters which represent the english words meaning in 100+ dimensions
!Watched two 3blue1brown videos to come to that!<
I feel like this is a reference to something but can’t quite firgure it out
LifeLemons@lemmy.mlto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The Linux version of the "sonic.exe" creepypasta would just be called "sonic"English
1·1 year agoTarball with gzip
Means sonic is like a zipbomb here
Can somebody figure out if any of the pieces can escape? Seems to secured properly and at the same time seems like hasn’t been secured.
How the hell is the person in image holding the paper bruv? Is he/she mad?
LifeLemons@lemmy.mlto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The problem with billionaires and never ending growth isn't the vast amount of accumulated wealth. The problem is that wealth was generated by depriving people of their health and livelihood.English
34·1 year agoBillionaires are billionaires because there are few who are billionaires. If everyone was a billionaire then nobody would see billionaires in awe but would see billion billionaires in awe. This is just a consequence of our social behaviour as being different always has a different response.
What I am saying is, billionaires are billionaires because not everyone is a billionaire and everyone is low compared to them.
!Note: I am not talking about “depriving people” topic. That’s different. !<
I know it’s fake but not AI
So I have been fooled?





Anon gets traumatized by teachers