MotoAsh

Yes. Yes implying plurality for a singular thing is, by definition, exaggerating.

Why not? It worked so well for the Democrats!

checks the news … wait … oh god… ohgodohgodohgod

Yea, the uncreative shitstains who can make nothing on their own because they do not understand the first thing about hard work or art.

“… to a certain point”

Yes thank you for agreeing that money DOES improve happiness.

Idiocracy was a utopia compared to what the fucking morons of reality will get.

Congratulations, you’ve utterly and completely missed the point about how money creates ample room for happiness. Whereas not having money creates stress and awful situations.

Again, congratulations on completely and utterly missing the point.

Always has been, hence why giving any of them power was beyond fucking braindead.

lol no. I’m sorry nuance is too difficult for your pea brain.

Well rich people demonstrably have better mental health as far as happiness than those struggling to pay bills or in even worse situations… So… Kinda’ a distinction without a point.

He whipped up on people for less.

If not believing in contradictory lies, corrupted parable, and a confused version of history people mistake for philosophy is edgy, you must live a very boring life.

If only Hell existed and if only it all wasn’t a ruse to placate people in to accepting their poor lot in life so the rich can continue to not be eaten by the poor.

LLM is being used in a colloquial way here. It’s just how the algorithm is arranged. Tokenize input, generate output by stacking the most likely subsequent tokens, etc.

It still differentiates it from neural networks and other more basic forms of machine “learning” (god what an anthropomorphized term from the start…).

Lots of “normal” feminists do that, too. Specifically, the ones that think “men” must be torn down in order to elevate women.

Anyone who thinks a group of people that aren’t actually in power (not all men actually benefit from patriarchy/machismo) need to be torn down is just contributing to the rat race fucked up world they’re whining about.

It’s not “men” that need to be torn down. It’s the systems that don’t distribute power equitably. These days, it should be pretty damn obvious most men are also not in the “-archy” club.

I really hope those aren’t sticking in to the couch… Those stakes look far thicker than the weave would have room for.

You mean a company who’s wallet depends on making it sound better than reality would claim it’s better than reality?!

I’m shocked.

There is ALWAYS a “better” battery coming down the pipe. Always. To say no NEW technology couldn’t work is an assumption, but so is assuming those new designs will deliver and be commercially as cheap.

The point still stands that a battery tech for vehicles needs to be power dense and as light as possible. Right now, salt batteries are MUCH worse than other tech. To say that salt batteries will win in the end is as dumb as saying the horse with a gimp will totally win the race after more training.

Even if the horse did have the potential, you don’t know other horses’ potentials nor do you know what other contenders will arise in the mean time.

Jeeze, too many people didn’t pay attention to middle school english classes.

Yea, that’s why I’d rather the government itself have an endpoint where the hard part is already implemented.

… ok I’d rather these stupid de-anonymizing laws were found to be against the constitution and completely unable to be forced on us…

That is a good scene.

Eh, IF the government had an endpoint to verify ID information, it wouldn’t be too bad implementation wise. … buuuut the modern government doesn’t provide anything any more and every damn dev team on the planet shouldn’t have forced access to peoples’ freaking IDs…