• shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It’s just a way of funding the BBC that was devised before a TV was something that essentially everyone had. Since it’s delivered OTA it seemed easier to tax the device itself then it was to tax everyone unfairly. So calling it a “license” is fairly outmoded, it’s really a tax. You also don’t have to pay it if you don’t actually receive TV channels.

        It should just be rolled into regular taxes now, but who is going to propose and approve a new tax in this day and age? So it’s easier not to touch it.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I wish we had a TV tax in Canada. The funding of the CBC is a political football, so I sometimes feel like CBC News has to walk a tightrope to avoid having the government slash the budget.

          It’s probably better that there’s just a tax on the device. Sure the UK government could meddle with that tax to cut the budget of the BBC, but it feels like it would be less likely since people would rightly ask why they’re meddling with it. People are less likely to ask questions if the government is cutting a budget because “gotta pay off the national debt!”

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    This reminds me of how Brits were always totally obsessed with all the regulations that the unelected EU bureaucrats were supposedly inflicting on us all the time, and then you’d go to France and see kids diving off a high-board into a shallow pool contaminated with battery acid with absolutely no lifeguards to be seen, and generally no-one seems to give a shit.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just so everyone’s aware the police do not care if you have a TV license.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Tell me about it, it’s like, every time I want to get some grilled prawns there’s always someone who goes “Oi mate, where’s yer Barbie license?”

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      And in Australia doing the same it’s “Oy wait up mate, where’s your Ocker licence?” Luckily we don’t need barbeque licenses, tong licenses, etc. we got away from the UK to escape all that bureaucratic red tape

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    Queen’s dodger can mean

    • someone who lives with the queen
    • someone who performs crimes on behalf of the queen
    • someone who finds those called for the draft but have not registered on behalf of the queen

    Which is it?

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      To watch tv in UK you need a tv licence

      This was done as sort of a tax to fund public television without taxing people who don’t use it

      The person then concludes that they should have voted for the nazis because liberals bad

      • GarfGirl [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They’re making fun of how Brexit was pushed on a platform of getting rid of overstrict EU regulations and bureaucracy (as well as a lot of overt racism) but it turned out a load of it was just homegrown British bureaucracy that had nothing to do with the EU but UKIP voters kept complaining that anything they didn’t like about Britain was the fault of the EU anyway

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean you do in the US as well, but it’s called “A Netflix/Hulu/Disney Plus membership”

        And it only funds one channel instead of dozens of TV, radio, web, apps, weather and news channels.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Also publicly funded TV tends to be way better. They have somewhat more accountability so especially news, politics etc tends to be much better. For leisure programs that varies a bit more by country, but obviously the BBC has produced a lot of great stuff.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          It did well for a long time. The BBC produces a lot of excellent programmes. It was also unafraid of holding the government’s feet to the fire.

          Unfortunately, the Tories successfully gutted it about a decade back. It still produces excellent programmes, but is neutered politically.

          As for the licence fee. It is effectively an extra tax. However, if you don’t watch TV, you don’t have to have a licence. It’s not perfect, but better than just a flat tax. It also helped keep them semi independent of the government.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Give it time. It won’t be a licence though, it’ll be a compatible bread subscription for a discounted toaster, with government enforced felonies for using incompatible bread

      *Based on how the software and entertainment industries work