• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I won’t believe a single headline about Trump doing poorly. Not until after Kamala wins and is sworn in without another coup attempt. Anything short of that is delusional. Go out and vote, people.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I mean, he could still murder JD Vance and replace the corpse with like nikki haley or something.

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yep. I’ve been forever hardened into a political and legal cynic starting with hanging chads and most recently, with the lack of Jan 6 accountability for Trump.

      Biden dropping out was a wonderful and pleasant surprise. I was NOT getting my hopes up that he would step down, especially given the DNC’s tendency to fuck up what should be easy wins.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      This has been a fait accompli since 2015. The only thing I guessed wrong about this election 9 years ago was Pelosi actually being able to convince Biden to drop out.

      Now that he has, Harris is a shoe-in.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love how his campaign is spiraling out of control, yet every poll that comes out still has them in a statistical tie. I’d like it to spiral a little quicker please.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Both things can be true.

      …What we’ve found for the last 10 years or so now is that when it comes to Republican candidates, and especially Trump, reality no longer matters. At all. There are 743,000 things that should have disqualified him for president. That Republicans should have noped out on, said “this is definitely not our guy”. They just don’t matter. For a number of reasons.

      His campaign could be literally a dog shitting on a US flag. And it wouldn’t change anything; he would still poll virtually the same. There are almost no actual “undecideds” leaning towards him.

      At this point, it’s about voter motivation and access. His guys CAN be less motivated to vote, and Harris supporters can definitely be more motivated to vote. That’s where we are.

      • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Isn’t that true about all US elections? There are no “undecided” voters, just Dems and Reps and the result is always based on who can motivate their voters the most.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not all.

          And it didn’t use to be. Well, as bad, anyway.

          Also, democrats and Democrat-aligned seem to be more likely to consider other options, or to call out their leaders. Not always, and probably not even most of the time. But significantly more often.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            Also, it goes in one direction. I know plenty of democrats who voted for a Republican president, but hardly any republicans that voted for a Democrat president.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          If that were true, then nobody would be worried about third-party voters. Off the top of my head, you might want to consider it 1992, 2000, and 2016.

          (Of course motivating people is really important, too.)

          • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Agreed, but I don’t know the mindset of those people and how to think of them. Do we just take them out of the voter pool? Are they potentially swing?

            My take on 2016 was that the Dems were deeply unenthusiastic about Hillary - and who can blame them - so they didn’t show up to vote. On the other hand the Reps were stoked about Trump so they turned up at the polls.

            Swing voters? I don’t get it. I cannot see any rational person sitting in the middle comparing Trump and Harris and picking Trump as a better presidential option. Irrational people? My gut tells me they they are probably sitting and the far ends of either camp.

            My guess is that the people closer to the middle aren’t actually swing voters, but they are far more likely to have their enthusiasm to vote influenced than the true believers.

            The big question, in my opinion, is how much - or how little - the polls reflect the enthusiasm to go out and vote. My impression is that Dem enthusiasm in high right now, while not so much for the Reps. It’s possible that a 50/50 poll may hide the fact that a big chunk of one of the 50% is much less likely to actually vote.

            I’m Canadian, so I see the news but I don’t have day to day experience with US voters. Of course, neither do the 90% of Americans that don’t live in those swing states.

            • orcrist@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Many polls are of registered likely voters. So as you point out, that data alone is not particularly informative on this issue.

              • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                My question is how much “likely” translates to “voted”. It seems easy to respond, “Yes”, when asked on the phone, but requires a bit more enthusiasm to actually go stand in line and cast a vote.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    contributor Ed Luce suggested the former president has quickly become his own worse enemy.

    Should be worst, but we can’t afford copy editors anymore and I hate it.

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I love glue on pizza. It’s up there with molten plastic on pizza. The plastic gives the pizza a nice tangy flavor and really lets the cheese stretch.

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I mean, this is something you could genuinely use an LLM for. “Find any grammatical errors in this text.” I mean, a word processor could also do that, but oh well.

        Also, since a lot of them seem at least partially trained on random internet content, and they don’t seem to have much of a problem with grammar, I don’t think that’s a valid tactic.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    All this negative news about trump everywhere makes me nervous. Don’t forget how confident everyone was when Hillary ran. Most, including myself, didn’t think trump stood a chance.

    Kamala hasn’t won yet. It’s still close. And trump has an unswayable cult behind him that see all this negativity as fuel to vote even harder.

    Dont get complacent or overconfident. trump could still win.

    • slimarev92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Who was confident about Hillary? She was a mediocre candidate with a ton of baggage. Kamala is a much better candidate (who still might lose).

    • renrenPDX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also I’m sure despite him saying that he will not debate again, he’ll change his mind and do better in round 2 after they drill enough talking points in his head. It doesn’t take a lot for his base to claim a debate victory. He just has to look the part for the duration of the debate.

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Wow, that’s a lot.

        You can dispute what he did and make the case that it had some kind of impact but I think you’re simultaneously (a) ignoring a bunch of other factors and (b) vastly overestimating how plugged in the average voter was to that drama. Hanging the election on Comey is wild.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’ve been real happy to see the nationwide composite polls and predictions slide to Harris’ favor.

    Stuff like 538 and 270towin were stagnant Trump advantages for so many monthsm

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Real polls take time. True opinion polls take at a minimum 2 weeks to conduct sufficient sampling and do analysis on and prep for release. You won’t see the full effect of the debate results in polls until, at the earliest, end of next week.

      And at the end of the day the only poll that matters is the one on November 5th…

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Maybe it’s the fact that most people treat it like a local team rivalry or a “I hate my team but I won’t let the others win”.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ooh ooh! Is he “increasingly isolated”?

    I love the part where he’s increasingly isolated.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      How can he become increasingly isolated from his previous state of complete and total isolation?

      I guess he could turn off the TV.

  • Sumocat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Hanging himself with his own rope” is a funny saying. Imagine someone borrowing your rope to hang themself. “Sure, Don, you can borrow my rope.” Then you go to get your rope back. “Hey, Don! You done with my… nah, dude, that’s your rope. That’s not my rope. My bad.”

    • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I think it means you’re killing yourself, instead of getting hanged by a hangman for example. Similar to shooting yourself in the foot.